Are there logical and scientifical reasons to believe that god exists?

Answer 1

Not one!

Answer 2

there's no need.the prophets had plenty of miracles 2 prove they were not lying.isn't that enough?one of Mohammad's miracles was splitting the moon into half.I've heard NASA has discovered the line.the quran also mentions that the sun moves in a certain path that i'm sure wasn't yet discovered by man back then.as u might know the sun is moving in the milky way gallexy with all the other stars in it in the same direction the planets orbit the sun and the moon orbits the earth and muslims were told to orbit the Kaaba.isn't that a clue.or do u think all these similarities r accidental.the quran also says that the mountaines move.well this has also been dicovered in the past 100 or less years.it was dicovered very recently that the everest is moving.and the plates that make the crust of the earth r moving 2.u'd know that if u've studied geology.have u?

Answer 3

It depends on whom you ask if there is a logical reason or reasons to believe god exists. As for scientifical there is none because that word scientifical doesn't even exist.

Answer 4

Scientifically man has not been able to create blood, spinal fluid, or any organic substance with rational or logical thought, or even honey. Man has only been able to recreate some things that have already been created and to manipulate it on a molecular level.
Logically it wasn’t man who created all these things, unless man created himself and I have yet seen anything or anyone smarter than it’s own creator and it is easier to deny the existence of God than it is to study what he has created and why. There is no proof that God doesn’t exist or for that matter, my own mother and father.

I personally will continue to believe in God and my own mother and father until someone can explain to me how man has created himself or when man can create an organic brain, spinal fluid, or blood and it not be artificial.

Answer 5

Scientific reasons for a god?...definitely not. I have taken numerous science classes throughout college and not one of them ever mentioned a god. Logical reasons? well that depends on the perspective of whom you're asking.

As for the people (like someone above) that say most scientists believe in god. I'm not sure where exactly that statement comes from but it simply isn't true. I'm not saying there isn't a god, I'm just saying that most scientists are atheist or agnostics.

http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=3341576&page=1%20

Answer 6

God is probably not what you think it is... God is the SUN, the light of the world, and the bible is a story based around the Zodiac and the 12 houses of the zodiac or 12 disciples/ months. Or as the bible calls the zodiac, the Mazzaroth. Jesus is nothing but a personification of the SUN in the constellation of Pisces. Do some basic research into astronomy, and basic astrology, not to mention ancient belief systems that were around before Christianity, and you'll see the LIGHT.

Answer 7

All kinds....archeology that proves the historicity of the Bible, fulfilled prophecy (with astounding mathematical probabilities), legal evidences (see the account of Simon Greenleaf, the single greatest authority on legal evidences in history), and so forth. In fact, Alexander Hamilton, a framer of the U.S. Constitution and one of the United States’ most prominent and brilliant early constitutional lawyers, once stated, “I have carefully examined the evidences of the Christian religion, and if I was sitting as a juror upon its authenticity I would unhesitatingly give my verdict in its favor. I can prove its truth as clearly as any proposition ever submitted to the mind of man.”

But the discovery of God begins in the heart, not the mind. Jesus said, "'Call to me and I will answer you and tell you great and unsearchable things you do not know.' (Jer 33:3)

Answer 8

I'm not judging as your question is simply "fun"
but...
IN MY OPINION:
No there's no direct evidence in any sort of religion, no matter which god or supreme being. Yes, there are multiple things that can not be explained in their totalitary but that does not mean its unexplainable yet. Simply means we've yet to come to a conclusion.
Either way, to the people that say evolution "disproves" itself - i laugh - simply means you don't understand genetics nor evolution..... A monk studied genetics and proved that it's all based upon parent cells and mutations AND even that specific environmental issues may cause changes. Mendes? Anyone?!
*THUMPS THE BIBLE HARDER CUZ IT'S SCIENCE!!!*
i respect religion, maybe respect science back... SHEESH

Answer 9

Scientific? No.

Logical? Yes. There are a variety of logical arguments for God's existence, or at least to believe in it. Usually the use God as sort of a wildcard to solve a problem. See, for example, Godel's Ontological Argument.

Answer 10

If you really want to give it a fair hearing, try the book titled:

Evidence That Demands A Verdict

There is also a sequel to that book titled:

MORE Evidence That Demands A Verdict

Answer 11

Actually, yes.

Most scientists through the ages have been believers and have "seen" God in his creation.

Evolution has disproven itself (as acknowledged by Darwin, himself).

Currently, other than God, there is no plausable theory.

The more intensly we search for simple, scientific solutions, the more complex life and our world become.

Study science, but study the Bible as well.

The answers will come to you.