Ok.. let me get this straight. The Word of God says we were created with Human bodies that are designed to live forever. Science has recently proven that if we were to learn something new every second, we would take well over 3 millions years to exhaust the memory capacity of our "post flood" brains. (Pre-flood brains were 3 times larger) On the other hand... Evolutionists say things evolve after there is a need for change.
http://www.remnantofgod.org/creation.htm#brain
How is it possible for us to have a brain that could hold enough info to last over 3 millions years, when all we can live up to is 90 years?
2007-12-04 12:29:40 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
"Science has recently proven that if we were to learn something new every second, we would take well over 3 millions years to exhaust the memory capacity of our "post flood" brains. (Pre-flood brains were 3 times larger)."
No, science has proven no such thing.
A creationist website does not equal scientific proof.
Hope that clears it up for you.
2007-12-04 12:34:23 · answer #1 · answered by Pangloss (Ancora Imparo) AFA 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Have you ever actually paid attention in a science class? Did you know that all of the advances that we enjoy today can be traced back to science? Did you know that every single time that religion and science disagreed on something, science has always turned out to be right?
Your question makes claims that are not scientific yet you want your question based in science. It does not work that way. First provide some scientific evidence to support the claim that pre-flood brains were 3 times larger then you can proceed with your question.
2007-12-05 07:01:54 · answer #2 · answered by A.Mercer 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dear dingbat,
I don't think evolutionists say that. Random mutations happen all the time. Most are detrimental. However, if you happen to change and that change puts you at an advantage over others, then you will be more 'fit' than them, but it doesn't mean you necessarily 'needed' the change in the first place.
Also, if your 3 million year theory were true, humans would be a lot smarter than they are (but they are not - most people on here can't even spell).
Even the Yahoo! spellchecker leaves mistakes that I have to go back and correct before some smartass points it out.
2007-12-04 12:44:47 · answer #3 · answered by James Bond 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is a case of misleading logic. No creature on the planet uses 100% of its brain capacity and never will do - let me explain why.
Our brains are akin to giant computers that whirl away almost constantly. Our memory section within the brain is like a hard drive, and as such requires regular updates and cleaning.
If that was not enough we are equiped with mega ram function that enables us to reason beyond our hard drive capability by applying seperate packages.
The brain however does something that most computers cannot - it can actually repair itself and redirect information that would otherwise be lost.
It is impossible to state how much of our brain we might be able to use for storage as opposed to all the other available functions - but heck, we may one day find out.
Untill that time I reckon we should use our brain for the benefit of all to the best of our capability, but not to worry about such complicated issues. [Not till after Christmas anyhows].
2007-12-04 12:41:22 · answer #4 · answered by Busman Bob 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
> "evolutionist believe that humans do not have a soul, and spirit and that we are completely accidentally formed by chance right?" No. [1] no field of science, evolution or otherwise, can comment on the existence of the soul. The soul, if it exists, is a non-physical phenomenon, and is therefore not open to investigation through science. [2] evolution is *not* "chance" or "accident", it is a process guided by natural selection, which is totally not random. > "how do they explain guilt? and saddness? and happiness?" Emotions are an important feature of our brains' function. We are social animals, so feelings of guilt, etc. are part of that socialisation (easily explained by evolution). And happiness/sadness/ etc. are also explainable as motivational drives for directing us towards (evolutionarily) advantageous behaviour. If we didn't feel happy or sad, there would be no reason to behave in specific ways. > "these are no functions of what we can see or explain." Sorry, but yes they are!
2016-05-28 05:26:00 · answer #5 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Which "science" proved "pre-flood brains"? Quick internet search didn't bring up anything.
The bible pre-flood, describes man in his current form. Not man three times larger, longer, or taller. Man was meant to live eternally, but he ate of the forbidden fruit, and blah, blah, blah.
If we knew everything, people like you wouldn't believe in God. I'm not saying that us Atheists no all, but we are one step further along.
2007-12-04 12:41:16 · answer #6 · answered by Sarcasma 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Post flood and pre flood brains?
Now I know you are making up a load of BS.
Since their is absolutely no scientific evidence to support that a Noah type flood ever occured, it seems obvious that your little attempt to call upon science to give credibility to your BS is truly hilarious.
2007-12-04 12:38:42 · answer #7 · answered by ndmagicman 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Congratulations, you invalidated everything you said by starting your idiotic uneducated rant with the word "evolutionist" which doesn't exist.
Why would I give a damn whether you think your god says you'll live forever or not?
Your link means nothing at all.
The brain doesn't hold info to last 3 million years idiot. We simply learn from our ancestors. Or we're supposed to. I sincerely have my doubts about whether you Christians are capable of learning anything when you post the complete idiocy that you just did.
2007-12-04 12:35:49 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Congratulations; a person has to be extremely dedicated to avoid learning anything at all about science and the world where they live in a society where knowledge is so readily available and everyone has access to an educational system.
2007-12-04 13:37:19 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Righty...so the bible beats neurological science?! Gimme a break.
For starters, we are dormant 1/3 of every 24 hour period, and in that time our brains do not learn. Even when we are awake, we still don't learn something every second.
2007-12-04 12:35:19 · answer #10 · answered by Rick 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋