English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-12-04 11:59:39 · 15 answers · asked by Rada S 5 in Politics & Government Military

!...and we claim to be the World Police for human rights.....?

2007-12-04 12:01:29 · update #1

If we are such hypocrites, why should anyone listen to us?

2007-12-04 12:06:46 · update #2

OK means legal!

2007-12-04 12:11:47 · update #3

15 answers

A soldier voluntarily fights knowing he/she might be killed. No one asked the baby.

2007-12-04 12:05:00 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 9 3

I think you're putting too much thought in to it, DON"T have abortion and YOU have nothing to worry about. Some women have no choices but to have an abortion, if you were raped and became pregnant would you keep the baby? Some babies are sick and would only be born into pain and suffering and die shortly anyway. What does a soldier being killed have to do with abortion? Nothing, why are you wasting your time? You're not going to change anything.

~So what everyone here is saying because you joined the Military your death is OK? Wow, I guess the soldier wasn't a brother, son, father, or husband?
That makes me sick that some people feel this way

2007-12-04 15:39:44 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

~Load the question any way you want to, but the essential facts remain the same.

A. The soldier is doing his job and has assumed the risk that the adversary will do the same. It is neither good nor bad. What is good or bad in this particular scenario is reason for which the soldier was placed in harm's way. Thus, when a Middle Eastern patriot kills an invading conquerer, it is an act of loyalty, justice, duty and nationalistic pride. Naturally, if you are on the side of the invader, that particular death would be a bad thing, but the death of the guy your guy just wasted would be a good thing. So it goes.

B. By definition, you cannot - as a simple matter of law, logic and common sense - kill that which is unborn. Killing involves the termination of life. The unborn have no life to terminate.


The next time you want to mix apples and oranges, why not just make juice?

2007-12-04 12:20:11 · answer #3 · answered by Oscar Himpflewitz 7 · 5 3

people could think of this is high quality because of the fact the possibilities are worse. In situations the place a woman is raped or if her existence is in possibility using her being pregnant, she should not be compelled to have the baby. And regrettably, having a baby while that's undesirable could have devastating effects for the unborn baby and the mummy. Take your capability and fervour approximately this subject and direct it in direction of restructuring u.s.'s adoption technique to make it much less complicated and occasional fee for couples to undertake orphans. Why do you think of lots of couples opt for to undertake babies from different international places while in u.s. we've over 500,000 orphans?

2016-10-19 04:43:06 · answer #4 · answered by limson 4 · 0 0

I think that the death of a soldier is bad.But my belief of an unborn child varies,if a woman is raped or if the mother would die from the birth or from carrying the child then it would be o.k.

2007-12-04 12:14:25 · answer #5 · answered by M-2 3 · 3 0

A soldier dieing is a very painful thing for those who love him, but he/she understands that it is a possibility when they get involved with the military. A unborn child has no say so, and deserves a chance.

2007-12-04 12:10:13 · answer #6 · answered by Tonette 2 · 4 3

They are both terrible but as sodiers we knowingly put ourselves in harms way an unborn baby on the other hand has no choice in the matter. I believe abortion is murder why not just use adoption?

2007-12-04 12:44:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

I think that.


And I dont claim to be the world police for anything.

2007-12-04 12:07:34 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 6 1

Wow Oscar...Middle Eastern Patriot? That's a new one... I found it especially patriotic when they blew up innocent women and children by the dozens to further their "cause". Nothing like leaving piles of mangled civilians to show loyalty, justice, duty and nationalistic pride...

2007-12-04 12:58:25 · answer #9 · answered by Marco R 4 · 2 3

I do, the servicemember (we're not all in the Army) is a fully formed person, most likely with friends, family, co-workers etc. who will miss him or her .....You assume the baby is going to grow up into a decent person....maybe they will, maybe they'll grow up to be another Osama.....

2007-12-04 13:18:28 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

fedest.com, questions and answers