English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Okay, an afterlife sounds really weird, because you cant exactly "create" an afterlife, and my theory is so simple. If there was an afterlife, don't you think the world would consist of other paranormal things? It'll be hard to explain.

I don't really believe in ghosts but i still think they could be out there. it's just that how come we see ghosts some times and other times we dont? (i get spooked writing about ghosts).

But one other thing hit me - something in the unierse weird has to have happened - how were the first things made? how did they come about? it is just weird to me that we know so little of what has happened, other than preserved things and religious books.

Could we somehow prove it? kill someone with ( **** i forget what it is when they say CLEAR, than zap, theyre back.) then bring them back to life with it, do it on a few subjects and ask them what the experience was like?

I want your opinions on all of what i just said it is just so weird.

2007-12-04 10:33:53 · 5 answers · asked by Josh 2 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

5 answers

Well, to answer your bold question, yes an afterlife is paranormal AND supernatural. And I doubt they would do experiments like that, since they run the risk of killing the subjects. But people HAVE had experiences like that before. Images of Heaven, or Hell, and those of different religions had the same experiences, except with their own interpretation of the afterlife. I hope this helps in some way. And even though I do not believe in an afterlife, and they probably wouldn't do such experiments, keep asking questions my friend! ^_^

2007-12-04 10:41:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Actually, there is a lot of evidence for the afterlife, but before you ridicule me consider this quote:
By far the most usual way of handling phenomena so novel that they would make for a serious rearrangement of our preconceptions is to ignore them altogether, or to abuse those who bear witness to them.

Prof. William James

From the second link:
Within a few weeks of Myers's death in 1901, some very strange communications began to be received by psychics in England, the United States and India. They came through automatic writing to a total of a dozen psychics and continued for a period of thirty years and then later by his fellow leaders of the Society for Psychical Research, Professor Henry Sidgwick and Edmund Gurney as they too died. What was strangest about them was that they made no sense. Or perhaps they did - for they were so mysteriously worded that it almost seemed their meaning was being deliberately concealed. And most of them were signed, "Myers." In all more than three thousand scripts were transmitted over thirty years. Some of them were more than forty typed pages long.
But although the text of the messages seemed indecipherable, the 'instructions' which often accompanied them were clear. These instructions repeated a number of themes. The 'script' should be sent to a particular person, who would turn out to be one of the other psychics involved. Or it should be sent to the Society for Psychical Research. And that although its content may seem to be senseless, it was in reality anything but: it was an attempt by the deseased communicator to prove his continued existence. These instructions and explanations were, in fact, frequent and explicit. "Record the bits," wrote Myers, "and when fitted they will make the whole." And again, "I will give the words between you that neither alone can read but together they will give the clue."

It was some time, however, before the people involved fully realized what was happening. When they did, they gathered the fragments together and found that they had communications which were clear, coherent and continuous. Most of these scripts consisted of references to and quotations from both classical and modern literature. Some were so obscure that only a scolar, and a specialized one at that, would recognize them.

2007-12-04 11:12:01 · answer #2 · answered by WakeUpNow 1 · 0 0

I saw that movie about killing and reviving people with the defribulator to get answers about life and death! It did not work out well for them.
There have been lots of studies, some very spooky, of people who have had near-death experiences and those who were revived and even death-bed interviews of multiple members of families that have been in very serious car accidents together (I think that one was in the Netherlands and it was really, really spooky). Some common elements appear, but no way to determine what the afterlife itself is like - we have revived the revivable - so they were still pretty much in the area - not actually dead.
I like the Universal Subconscious concept that explains ghosts as well as a lot of paranormal things. In that concept, you are getting old records from the ghost's subconscious, which remains "on-line" in the Universal Subconscious forever.

2007-12-04 10:45:22 · answer #3 · answered by Amy R 7 · 0 0

my friend, nothing you said is weird.
being i am a ghost i will gladly answer your questions.
we ghosts love to puzzle and preplex people.
thats one reason why, sometimes you see us, sometimes
you don,t
weird unexplained noises, our speciality.
if you met one of us i bet you would like us.
i got to go back to work, bye for now.

2007-12-04 10:43:49 · answer #4 · answered by Jerry S 7 · 0 0

i think you're gonna have a hell of a time finding people who want to be killed and then "zapped back" :)

2007-12-04 10:42:53 · answer #5 · answered by danibell919 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers