Unless the other car was in reverse, or did some other illegal act that directly contributed to the crash, there is a high probability of a conviction.
Of greater concern to you should be the potential for a civil lawsuit by the other driver.
If you contest the charge, and are found guilty, the findings of the trial can be used as evidence in a civil lawsuit. A plea of "no contest" can not be used as evidence in a civil trial.
No contest simply means you are not admitting guilt, you just chose not to contest the charge.
2007-12-04 11:12:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by trooper3316 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sure. While driving along some guy hiding in my backseat jumped up and grabbed me from behind. Because of his actions, the car could no longer be controlled and collided with the other person. The stranger then jumped out of my car and ran away! Good luck.
2007-12-04 11:41:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by JR 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It depends in what state your accident happened. If it happened in N.C you are out of luck as N.C. is a contributory negligence state. If the accident happened in a comparative negligence state you have a chance. If it can be proved the other driver contributed to the accident in any way you could get lucky in the amount of damages that could be assessed against you.
2007-12-04 11:07:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by firewomen 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Only if the driver of the other car rear ended you, otherwise you're at fault.
2007-12-04 10:48:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by I do 26.2 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not really.
If you rear ended a car, you are most likely at fault. Without knowing exactly what charge was, no one can really give you advice.
2007-12-04 10:25:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by Citicop 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Why is it people don't want to just take responsibility for things when they have done something wrong?
You Have NO defense. You didn't keep enough distance between you and the other vehicle so just go plead guilty or just pay the fine and be done with it.
2007-12-04 10:49:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by KittyKat 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Did you consider telling the truth and paying if you were responsible for ruining someone else's car and putting them through all kinds of misery getting it repaired and dealing with their insurance company?
You could even apologise.
2007-12-04 10:29:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
If you win a rear end case, you will be the first in the history of driving. Let us know how it goes :)
2007-12-04 10:40:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by Barry C 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
if you rear end another car, you're following too close, don't have YOUR car under control, and 101% of the time it's YOUR fault. don't throw more good money after bad.
2007-12-04 10:41:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by gen patton 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
There are 2 diverse areas to contemplate: criminal Fault and Civil legal accountability. Criminally, you're probable accountable of following too heavily. There are some situations the place you won't be at fault. in case you should exhibit that the motive force in front of you probably did no longer exact sign his intentions, you may sometimes get off. If the automobile in front of you made a planned provide as much as rigidity you into an twist of fate, then that's think approximately criminal reason, and he's accountable. regrettably, those are troublesome to show. Civil legal accountability pertains to who's responsible for the damages. you ought as an occasion something referred to as negligence as a manner to collect damages. Negligence has (4) areas: one million) legal accountability Owed; 2) legal accountability Breached; 3) honestly Damages; 4) Proximate reason. section one million: you have a legal accountability to circumvent hitting the automobile in front of you. section 2: You breached your legal accountability by using following too heavily. section 3: honestly damages. Did you honestly injury his automobile. Or, became into the automobile broken in the previous you hit it? section 4: became into there a "proximate reason", or a reason-effect dating, out of your following too heavily, and his automobile being broken. section 4 is the difficult section. If the guy complains of neck discomfort, yet became into already going to the chiropractor previous to the twist of fate, it must be confusing for him as an occasion which you brought about the wear to his neck. If by some skill you may show that the corvette brought about the twist of fate, you may circumvent legal accountability. troublesome to do, by means of fact the corvette did no longer provide up. in short, you're no longer "immediately accountable" once you rear-end somebody. in spite of the undeniable fact that that's truly stressful as an occasion that that's somebody elses fault. The final part of your question is "do I even have finished legal accountability." there's a term referred to as Contributory Negligence, wherein an element of the blame is assigned to each motive force in the twist of fate. Had the automobile in front of you collided with the corvette, then the corvettepersistent could share an element of the legal accountability. My years of adventure as an coverage agent recommend which you're probable a minimum of fifty one% negligent. wherein case, you would be responsible for paying her damages.
2016-10-10 06:22:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋