Airplanes and rockets don't violate any laws of gravity or physics. I think the point made about god not existing is a valid point.
2007-12-04 04:56:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by tanzer360 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
This sounds fairly exciting. "narrows down the want for beginning to an originating factor, which by using contingency demands a main Mover (God) and a loss of originating factor, which factors to the theory of countless regression (that the universe is countless, and not in any respect had a commencing up). this means that we ought to continuously settle for that the two there is an beginning or there is not any longer, and in case you agree for that there is then that First reason/top Mover suits the God Aquinas argued for." the undertaking here is that info shows otherwise than affirming the universe is countless... the universe is finite and had an origination factor... there is evidence of this. The evidence is the enhance of the universe as obvious by using purple-shift adjustments... do greater examine in this in case you wish. additionally, there is not any evidence that the commencing up of the universe replaced into the 1st reason, different universes ought to exist exterior of the universe... there is merely too many contingencies contemporary to verify and to discredit/validate Aquinas' argument. on condition that there replaced into an originating factor meaning that the universe had a commencing up. affirming on condition that God replaced into there the originating factor is non-existent is unsuitable, whether God exists there replaced into nevertheless a factor of beginning to the universe. I settle for that we don't comprehend for advantageous how the universe began... leaping to God does not decrease it. I delight in philosophy, yet now and lower back we ought to continuously deliver technology into it to make advantageous we've a valid ideology and/or theory. "the theory of countless regression states the universe as a bounded yet countless 'situation'. even regardless of the undeniable fact that, what if this universe have been to be contingent? This makes no logical experience: a contingent universe, even sequentially inflicting itself by way of consistent levels, might might desire to have a conventional reason, so can not exist interior the countless regression theory. this means that the universe, interior the theory, must be needed." countless regression is incorrect as i've got mentioned earlier. If it have been a universe countless in time it does not want a conventional reason. additionally, a contingent universe may be countless.
2016-10-19 03:26:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well I violate the law of gravity all the time.
Maybe you just don't have enough faith in free will.
2007-12-04 04:57:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Just like the rest of the laws of physics...you don't have the brain power to violate it....but you do have the free will to try....just like everything else in your pathetic life...you could shoot yourself...but you won't even try...so why ask an assinine question like this one???
2007-12-04 06:09:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
As we are bound to the Earth, so was our purpose. We are not lords, we are servants. We are not angels, we are humans. Life is a gift, we should be grateful for what He gave us. If He wanted us to fly without a machine or construct, He would make it that way.
2007-12-04 05:45:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by Christian Sinner 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
actually he did, that why we have things in space and why the effects in Apollo 13 looked so good.
Have you never heard the term surface tension
Bouyancy
Science is working on the process of walking on water as we speak.
It just takes science centuries to catch up to God
2007-12-04 05:00:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
We are violating,arent we ? What are we doing in space ? Isnt it violation of gravity.
2007-12-04 04:54:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by MrKnow_All 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Go ahead and violate it. Make sure you page us all once you float past the moon.
2007-12-04 04:55:38
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
science has never proven the existence of gravity
2007-12-04 05:38:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
because I might just float on up to heaven on a little cloud
and then slide back down on a rainbow
2007-12-04 04:54:30
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋