Yes, both ways.
2007-12-04 04:26:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by thezaylady 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
sure/No solutions are relatively confusing. as an occasion 2 religions might declare conflict on one yet another and years later those comparable 2 religions might come to a decision to call a truce. there is info then, that the two religions have been (a million) the reason of conflict and (2) the source of peace. very few issues may be responded with an elementary sure or no. the respond to virtually each little thing probable lies someplace interior the middle floor. on an identical time regardless of the undeniable fact that, for the reason that's, in spite of everything, an casual communicate, i'm going to flow out on a limb and say that frequently talking, faith is a explanation for conflict.
2016-10-19 03:23:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
When it comes to words It is supposed to be a source of inner peace and peace in general. Most (if not all) religions teach this.
But when it comes to actions, as religions around the world gathered power and money they turned themselves as a source of conflict to gain more power and more money. It's human nature. So for the last hundreds of years religions are used as a political weapon.
2007-12-04 04:31:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by fretless 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's a source of peace for believers and conflict for non-believers, or sometimes people who believe differently. It depends on the religion - whilst I am not believer I accept people get comfort from believing and should be free to believe as they choose, except for Islam. The biggest problem I have with Islam is it's globalisation agenda to convert 'infidels' and spread Islam across the world. I have many, many problems with the cult itself and yes, I have read the three translations of the Qu'ran.
2007-12-04 05:52:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Any religion of God is a source of Peace & Prosperity; and mythologies are following the code of conducts laid by these religions of God, All-wise, All-high.
Its Followers make religions clash to win ego battles & for having lack of tolerance which is only a personal matter.
Religions have ideology whereas People have egos.
2007-12-04 06:18:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by Habib 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Old Testament is full of violence. Many religions are a source of peace. Not the Abrahemic religions.
2007-12-04 04:34:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by OKIM IM 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Both actually...throughout history humanity has used religion as an excuse to wage war...a commandment from God so to speak...in general religions preach peace and goodwill...but men in need of power, wealth and control use the religious beliefs of the population to gain that which they seek...
2007-12-04 04:28:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Both. It depends on the people. For those who want to live peaceful lives they can derive inspiration and guidance. For those who wish to wage war it can provide the excuses to do as they wish.
It is the intentions of the person that dictate the nature of their belief. Two people will interpret the same text/teachings in different ways to achieve their goals.
2007-12-04 04:37:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by Birdie2006 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
religion in itself has to be a source of conflict because it puts personal belief into an organised structure. once belief is organised, rules and laws come along and this takes away personal choice therefore introducing conflict firstly, with one's self and secondly, with those who are not part of your belief group.
2007-12-04 05:05:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by kini 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The religeon itself is very peaceful, however the people that use it can often be the source of conflict.
2007-12-04 04:29:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by Orphelia 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
the bible itself is a source of conflict. As a child you are roped in by thinking and learning God is love, (new testament)when you are an adult all they talk about is sin and punishment (old testament) It wants us to be ignorant and innocent yet tells us all the sins of mankind
2007-12-04 05:26:29
·
answer #11
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
0⤋