Wow... that number seems really low to me!
I loved pre-marital sex when I was... erm... pre-marital ;-P
2007-12-04 02:02:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
No i dont agree. i believe that sex should come after marriage. The world's values have changed a lot and this is a major problem.
If you have sex before marriage you should at least be responisble for your actions. How many children are growing with a single parent? Lots of children.
Another point is that you can't give guys everything. If he really loves you he will wait until after marriage to make love.....those are the really man.
2007-12-04 02:09:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by stargirl 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
i agree with it. for reasons such as bringing you closer, knowing more about the person before marrying, building closer bonds.
Elysia, for your information, being a single parent doesn't mean they had sex without being married. my parents were married, had 3 children, were together 4 20 years and then divorced. I have suffered no ill effects from being brought up by my mother. My father was also still around, divorce doesn't mean the children don't see the other parent, or get any love from them. Your views sound religion-based... gosh how can people allow religion to control every aspect of their lives??
2007-12-04 02:21:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's an individual choice. For me, marriage isn't necessary. I don't know if I'll ever get married. But that doesn't mean I sleep around either. I have to have and emotional connection to the person I'm sleeping with. I'm naturally very physical about how I express my emotion, always have been (not necessarily meaning sexual). Expressing my feelings in a relationship through sex is natural for me, but there's always strong emotions behind it. Like I said, I don't sleep around.
2007-12-04 02:04:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by Erin 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Do you buy a car without a test drive? I think not! I would try sex with the person you were going to marry before you actually got married. You could save yourself a life time of bad sex or looking elsewhere for the things your partner does not offer in the sack.
2007-12-04 02:07:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
i think its fine, b/c i have had sex since i was in 8 th grade and i dont think its fine to start young but i still think pre-marital sex is fine.
2007-12-04 02:02:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by Carly-Bear 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
many couples are not ready for the emotional baggage that comes with pre-marital sex...say no...
2007-12-04 02:04:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you marry someone without having sex with them and you are not sexually compatible with them what do you do then divorce? That is against religious beliefs too. You need to try it before you buy it.
2007-12-04 02:03:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by ziggywit420 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well I did it and had a child. As for believing in it, I wish I would have waited to get married, but things didnt work out like that. So NO I Don't believe in it.
2007-12-04 02:02:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Christians do not incredibly care approximately premarital intercourse. it incredibly is purely Catholics that have standards. "The bible teaches intercourse is for the procreation of the species purely. Thats why they dont have faith in delivery administration or masturbation." No. The bibles teaches that a husband and spouse ought to in no way withhold intercourse from one yet another different than by utilising mutual consent for the objective of fasting for prayer. intercourse-for-procreation-purely is a Baptist invention and Baptist are heathens.
2016-12-10 12:13:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋