What does that tell you about intelligence and survival? According to Christians, we are not only superior to animals (read the Bible), we are not EVEN animals (read the Bible).
2007-12-04 01:25:05 · 25 answers · asked by I'm an Atheist 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I apologize: I meant jungle, not forest. If you want to shoot me for not understanding earth science, then all Christians would be dead from gunshot wounds long ago.
2007-12-04 01:35:19 · update #1
some of these answers are hilarious... thank you
2007-12-04 01:40:03 · update #2
The Scientist would eat the monkey. Then the theologian would eat the scientist.
It isn't a question of intelligence but ruthlessness.
2007-12-04 01:33:57 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
The scientist would be brutally axe-murdered by the theologian within the first week. And the theologian will die of starvation waiting for Jesus to bring him food.
The monkey wins the day! And, within a few million years, his ancestors, a scientist, a theologian, and a super-monkey, all meet again in the woods, only for the same thing to happen again...
2007-12-04 09:39:20 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
:)
the monkey would have a better chance of surviving, he would listen to his instincts better then people.
scientist would be next in line, but only if he can get his head out of the lab and the books and really looked around.
not real sure what the theologian would do, it would really depend on if he had more education or not...i would bet on the monkey to live, unless the poor thing got caught by the other two :)
2007-12-04 09:28:16 · answer #3 · answered by FarmerCec 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The scientist would probably be last. Assuming that he is some sort of biologist and have knowledge of edible things, he would attempt to make shelter and gather food. The theologian would then kill him and take all his stuff and conveniently repent later. The monkey would swing off and survive.
2007-12-04 11:40:46 · answer #4 · answered by Moo 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Depends on the type/location of forest, the type of monkey, the previous life experience and training, physical capabilities, and resources of the theologian and the scientist. In other words, your strawman question is totally lame. I know a scientist who specializes in monkey research and does theology at a near professional level. And she'll tell you that it's only time and cance that will answer this question and after repeating it many many times you could make some conclusion. But I'm sure you knew that, being such a science buff. t's juts not as easy to score easy and MEAN digs on other people when you hold yourself to your own standards, is it?
2007-12-04 09:36:36 · answer #5 · answered by ledbetter 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
The monkey, due to the fact that it doesn't consider itself superior and therefore is more readily prepared for the hardship of survival.
Although there is such a thing as a religious scientist, and i imagine someone like that would give the monkey a run for it's money when the religious scientist started to hunt it down for food.
2007-12-04 09:28:49 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
The scientist would survive. He and the theologian would kill the monkey and cook him, but the scientist would let the theologian eat first. If the theologian did not contract ebola virus, the scientist would kill him and eat the rest of the monkey.
2007-12-04 09:37:42 · answer #7 · answered by Who Else? 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Only the monkey would survive, because both the scientist and the theologian are too accustomed to the comforts of modern civilization.
2007-12-04 09:29:56 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
the scientist is the most likely to survive, because his is the smartest of the three, so long as he is an atheist scientist, although he probably wouldn't be stupid enough to be thrown into a forest in the first place, the theologian probably got told to by a big unreferenced book, dictated by a loud mouthed idiot in a big hall full of people who believe in exactly the same thing. the monkey would have to adapt to survive in a forest, seeing as how they live in jungles, the eco system is different, and as there's only one monkey it can't breed and produce more monkeys with desireable characteristics. the theologian would probably believe his 'god' would save him and die a horrible death. the scientist would use his knowledge of the world to fashion himself a shelter and hunt for food using that big old human brain of his.
2007-12-04 09:30:41 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
The scientist would be least likely, in my opinion.
The theologian would have a hunting rifle with him.
The monkey, well that is a no-brainer.
Christians seem to be more concerned with denying marriage based on gender than they are about getting hand guns out of the hands of children.
2007-12-04 09:38:43 · answer #10 · answered by Gorgeoustxwoman2013 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋