...........
MK committed the same crime as Taslima did. But you love to adore Taslima while do abhor MK for the same reason.
I wonder..
W
H
Y......???
Does it not prove your hypocrisy ? Dhakkan ?
...................
EDIT:1:
Sorry Shak & Robi A [BELOW]..........
Taslima is hated amongst the Muslims just becoz she wrote derogatory remarks about Mohammad like MK remarked about Lord Rama in an indecent manner.
She has now deleted the controvercial pessages. Did you see today's NEWS papers ? The Muslims have welcomed her step.
The Muslim reaction was not for her writings about minorities plight in Bangladesh.
correct yourself.
.................
EDIT: 2
ROBIN A...........
I just saw your remarks reproduced here........
NO. TASLIMA IS EXPOSING THE SINS COMMITTED BY BLOODY katuas IN BANGLADESH.
Can you elaborate what KATUA means you bloody fanatic bashibazouk ?
You are disgracing your religion by such remarks and you & alike are the ones who are responsible for all sort of hatred on this earth.
Remember, I will not be provoked by your silly behaviour
becoz ...........
I LOVE HINDUS............
and you are a ' K A L A N K "
on the face of Hndus & Hinduism.
......................
2007-11-30 04:12:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by ♪¢αpη' ε∂ïß♪ ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Valmiki's Ramayana is not a biography. It is an epic.
No body knows whether Shri Rama lived.
Hindus worship Shri Rama as an incarnation of Lord
Maha Vishnu.
Whatever Karunanidhi said will hurt the feelings of Hindus.
But it has nothing to do with the political problems of the Tamils in Malaysia .Many Malaysian Indian Tamils are Muslims.
You are confusing politics with religion.
Karunanidhi is a very selfish man and a pseudo scholar
Money and his family are more important for him
than our Nation. He is out and out a politician as
other Indian politicians are.
Hindu activists are also non-nationalistic.
I wonder why should they object to Sethu Samudram project
claiming that there was a bridge built by Shri Rama, and
that it should not be destroyed. They very well know that
they are lying.and that what ever they is not true..
2007-11-30 01:29:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by tmuthiah 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
If non-Tamil hindus were harassed Karunanidhi would have applauded instead of criticised Malaysia.
To captn edib, the questioner is not a politician.
To submit an affidavit and to question the very existence of Ram is different from asking for protection of Taslima who by the way is facing all this because she criticised the official discrimination of Hindus by Bangladesh. Why didn't Karunanidhi and other Pseudo seculars question the existence of jesus or Muhammed or that God really spoke to them. You cannot prove that either. The day Karuna questions all as an atheist i'll respect his views, until then he's just an opportunist who supports LTTE and muslim terrorists and is given the title "Friend of Islam". What you show is muslim Hypocrisy Edib. Hindus are not bigots like you all!
2007-11-30 06:00:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
For Karunanidhi,Tamils are not Hindus of Rama,they are Dravidians (may be Ravana's Culture!).Generally, Politicians are known to be weird, self seeking and will do anything and everything to garner vote, Besides, Mr. Karunanidhi may be entering to senility!
2007-11-29 21:16:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by Thimmappa M.S. 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Hindu religion is not leader based,like Islam,Christianity.It has many sects many GURUS and many followers,but preaching the same TRUTH.So might be Mr.Karunanidhi does not believe in Ram but believes in something and somebody
say SANKARCHARYA.But he is a Hindu.He has every right to speak for Hindu in Malaysia.Believing Ram only is Hinduism,who says?
2007-11-30 02:45:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by ashish c 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes. And its good that he got (and will get) what he deserves.
NOW THIS IS FOR Capn Edb and the other claptrap Muslim.
I will tell this to you SLOWLY, OK....?
Taslima exposed the KILLING/MURDER AND RAPE OF HINDUS IN MUSLIM - DOMINATED BANGLADESH.
That's why MUSLIMS want her silenced, because they know one day they will HAVE TO PAY FOR IT.
And that day is not far.
There is NO CONNECTION BETWEEN DMK Karunanidhi abusing Hinduism and Taslima exposing Muslims.
If there is a connection it is only in the mind of MUSLIMS, who are VERY CUNNINGLY PORTRAYING TASLIMA AS AN ABUSER OF ISLAM.
NO. TASLIMA IS EXPOSING THE SINS COMMITTED BY BLOODY KATUAS IN BANGLADESH.
Listen, you guys theink you are so smart. And sp you are...
But beware, Hindus are catching up.
Payup Time will soon arrive.
Jai Bhagavan
2007-11-30 19:38:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by Robin A 1
·
1⤊
1⤋
Karunanidhi has been playing the part of "the champion for the cause of the Tamils" for the last 70 years!
His deep seated concern for Tamilians in Malaysia only made him react so.The same reason emboldened him to make adverse remarks on Lord Ram vis-a -vis Sethu project!
We cannot judge as to who is accepted by god and who is kicked by him!
2007-11-30 01:15:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by The Tribune 5
·
0⤊
3⤋
I dont think he spoke for Hindus he used the word Tamils, he is the worst communal politician with absolutely no brains whatsoever.
Well Indian politics has ample such examples so guess we are not exactly in a very bright situation.
2007-11-29 21:11:10
·
answer #8
·
answered by funnysam2006 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
expensive, Ram became the suited personified. he's observed as "Mariyadha Purshothaman" "Respectful Gentleman" He confirmed us a selfless existence and how you're able to play each function completely. He became a suited son He became a suited brother He became a suited relative He became a suited love of his spouse as quickly as he became a king...... He grew to grow to be a suited king..... "He confirmed us once you rule a rustic, your loved ones comes 2nd" "you're able to have the means to sacrifice something in existence for the sake of the country and its human beings". or you're able to not soak up that submit. He shown to the international, that once he became a king, he have been given seperated from his maximum enjoyed guy or woman interior the international, his spouse Sita for the undesirable feeling and rumors of folk while sita got here back there have been a good number of rumors and communicate on how Sita lived in Lanka and suspecting her integrity. They have been questioning how Ravana did not touch her. He made her to do Agni Pariksha to teach her purity. Even then minds of folk did not convince. finally he had to deliver her to exile, so as that persons end speaking in this remember and communicate approximately their lives..... that's a sacrifice as a king......... Even as we talk see, we communicate undesirable approximately him...... whilst he had his with him we spoke undesirable approximately him We made him to try this as we talk the comparable we ask .... Why did he deliver her
2016-11-13 01:31:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Karunanidhi is absolutely parochial when he speaks for Hindus, he is speaking only for Tamilians in Malaysia, and most of Tamilians in his opinion are atheists. This shows the kind of wisdom he possesses.
2007-11-29 21:06:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by crewsaid 5
·
3⤊
2⤋