English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Please read these articles FIRST before commenting:
http://www.shoutwire.com/viewstory/36806/George_Bush_Admits_Demolitions
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/september2006/180906bushimplies.htm
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/09/20060915-2.html

FROM THE MOUTH OF BUSH HIMSELF: September 15, 2006

Press Conference of the President, The Rose Garden, 11:15 A.M. EDT

"For example, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed described the design of planned attacks
of buildings inside the U.S. and how operatives were directed to carry them
out. That is valuable information for those of us who have the responsibility
to protect the American people. He told us the operatives had been instructed
to ensure that the explosives went off at a high -- a point that was high
enough to prevent people trapped above from escaping."

Then take a look at:

http://ae911truth.org

http://truth911.net

http://911weknow.com

http://belowgroundsurface.org

http://seeloosechange.com

http://physics911.net

2007-11-29 10:29:52 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Military

Please take a look at the strong evidence for
all the fake Bin Laden videos and terror threats:

http://infowars.net/articles/november2007/291107Laden.htm

2007-11-29 10:30:34 · update #1

FACT: Melting point of steel (iron) = 1532 Celcius
This high temperature cannot be created by jet-fuel fires,
due to the lack of oxygen in the normal air pressure of 101.3kPa.
Jet-fuel air fires can only burn at around 233 to 330 Celcius, or
in a strong wind with perfect controlled mixing of all fuel, up
to 600 Celcius. In very strong winds, it may be possible to get
slightly higher, but in almost all building fires, glass and
aluminium rarely ever melts (fires never exceed the melting point
of aluminium, at 650 Celcius). The molten iron shown dripping
out of the South Tower is indeed molten steel, liquid iron, not
aluminium (because liquid aluminium is silvery/grey in colour),
and molten iron can only be formed at temperatures over 1532 C,
or about 2800 F. Paper fires combust at Fahrenheit 451F = 233 C
and burn at around 250 - 300 C, depending on breeze. Molten iron
is IMPOSSIBLE to create in a hydrocarbon fuel-air fire. You need a
blast, induction or arc furnace to melt steel!

2007-11-29 10:33:23 · update #2

Molten Metal:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JithuVAIb7Y

(Melting temperature of steel = 1532 C, hottest fire temperature for an open air fuel fire, where the only source of oxygen is still air, is only 600 C (well mixed fuel), but typically, still air fires burn at about 233- 250 C.

Aluminium melting point = 550-650 C. Aluminium frying pans do not melt in open air fires.

Controlled demolitions:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qa7PN-8T2VY

Building 7:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZ9BofDUXv0
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2073592843640256739

Flight 93:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-59kouBgO_s&NR=1

Pentagon:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rgyq2H7PpO0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lSeaZLYViwU

Part 1:
http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docId=-8452331984890658202&hl=en

Part 2:
http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docId=1018616329475082196&hl=en

Part 3:
http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docId=6024263701753064760&hl=en

Do your research!!!!

2007-11-29 10:36:24 · update #3

15 answers

Surely you can't believe all of this drivel, can you? You need to start wearing a tinfoil hat if you beleive this tripe!

2007-12-02 23:41:26 · answer #1 · answered by Gerry H 3 · 2 0

Sorry, but it's an established fact that typical building fires are at 1100 deg C. At this temperature, steel loses 90% of its strength

As absolute proof of this, hundreds of photos showed the steel supports, in the twin towers, bending just before collapse:

There was “…inward bowing of the exterior columns, reaching an observable maximum of about 55 in. near column 316 on the 96th floor. The inward deflection appeared to extend over the entire south face of the building at this time, and was visible between the 94th and 100th floors.”

From: NIST (National Institute of Science & Technology) NCSTAR 1-3 Section E.3.5
http://wtc.nist.gov/NISTNCSTAR1-3.pdf

And on top of this, the main cause of the collapse was the fact that the jets knocked out numerous supports. The fire only finished the job.
...

2007-11-29 20:27:42 · answer #2 · answered by J 5 · 6 2

So? It looks like by the premise of your question you believe al Qaeda was responsible for the attacks from information the military and the CIA was able to extract from a captured KSM.

But nowhere in Bush's statement does it say he believes explosives were used. He is talking about KSM's designs and intentions of how 9/11 was supposed to come off.

Good for you! This is a huge step gettting past the wild conspiracy theories posted by the usual idiots.

2007-11-29 19:01:50 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

I think you owe me an apology for this tripe. In all of your references, not once did you provide a reliable source. Popular Mechanics performed an exhaustive study of 9/11, as has a number of other groups with great standing in the rational community, and not once has there been a single shred of evidence that 9/11 was an inside job.

Clearly you have chosen this forum to spew your verbal diahrea and express your hatred for George Bush. If you want to gain any credibility whatsoever, perhaps you can try bashing him for issue that are legitimatly his fault, such as a massive display of passiveness towards criminal immigration, an incredibly weak U.S. dollar, outsourcing at all-time highs, and home foreclosures at record levels.

You are disgusting in every sense of the word. You are offensive to all five senses. Please remove yourself from any further debate about which you know nothing.

2007-11-29 19:36:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 7 2

I still marvel at the number of people who believe what they read on the internet. Anyone can post their ideas on the world wide web... anyone. That's why I never believe posts like ... give me a break here... truth911.net... which has posted so much pure bunk that is just laughable! Ask for solid validation and documentation for sources and you get some made up crap that does not pan out. I have checked it out long ago... and I don't need to do it again.

2007-11-29 18:47:52 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 8 2

I know that you are a troll. Take the other posters' advice and get a tinfoil hat!

2007-12-03 07:43:07 · answer #6 · answered by Bob 3 · 0 0

Don't give up your Conspiracy Theory TROLL job to sell used cars, or you will starve!!!

2007-11-30 02:20:31 · answer #7 · answered by conranger1 7 · 3 1

It is sad you put so much effort into something that just will not sell to the vast majority.

Use your talent for something useful.

2007-11-29 18:42:36 · answer #8 · answered by The Voice of Reason 7 · 12 1

Truth cant be avoided anymore.
lots of good links, thx

maybe one day the sheeple will awaken, and we can start to repair the damaged caused by these neocons.

2007-11-30 05:49:23 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 5

Did you know he arrested Santa Claus last year too!

2007-11-29 18:42:35 · answer #10 · answered by Think for yourself 6 · 9 2

fedest.com, questions and answers