does it say so in the bible?
2007-11-29 09:14:43 · 9 answers · asked by frogtra1n 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Are you implying that john the baptist didn't have balls?
2007-11-29 09:24:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Does it matter?
Some things are not described in the Bible. However, to describe some things would be irrelevant and would have no bearing on the things that we are supposed to learn from reading the Bible.
I myself believe that John the Baptist was a normal man who had a very important mission--to testify of the Messiah, and to initiate and provide an imperative ordinance for people:baptism.
2007-11-29 09:28:26 · answer #2 · answered by colebolegooglygooglyhammerhead 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not in the physical sense but in the sole commitment sense, yes I'd say.
Solo - the eunuch is Acts is not named. Just that he worked for Candace -queen of the Ethiopians
2007-11-29 09:18:57 · answer #3 · answered by K in Him 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No Scriptural Reference.
2007-11-29 09:17:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No... I don't recall the eunuch being named, but I know it wasn't John.
2007-11-29 09:18:51 · answer #5 · answered by ►solo 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Jesus called him the greatest prophet that ever lived...
2007-11-29 09:17:53 · answer #6 · answered by Commander 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
LOL NO!!!
And just which king do you think HE would deign to serve other than God???
2007-11-29 09:24:48 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No but was Jesus' older cousin.
2007-11-29 09:19:59 · answer #8 · answered by grnlow 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If he was, it wasn't by choice!
2007-11-29 09:32:38 · answer #9 · answered by connor g 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋