2007-11-29 03:20:53 · 7 answers · asked by Je Marche Drôle 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
((((Bettie!))))
2007-11-29 03:25:16 · update #1
Well, since they wore leaves, then fur, I'm going to say it was more mank than lint...
(((you cute penguin, you!)))
Edit: Heh-heh...I'm moving slowly today, it seems...=0)
2007-11-29 03:24:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Logically they may not have belly buttons since they not born from the womb with umbilical cords.
Interesting question though.
2007-11-29 11:26:02 · answer #2 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, because their bear-skin, high-waisted thong underwear kept the lint out.
:)
2007-11-29 11:49:00 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
If they were real they wouldn't have belly buttons so the answer is no.
2007-11-29 11:26:11 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
That would be a trick, since they didn't have belly buttons.
2007-11-29 11:24:00 · answer #5 · answered by Faye 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Enough to knit a sweater. ((((CBC))))
2007-11-29 18:46:54 · answer #6 · answered by Purdey EP 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
yes, but it is in their ears.
2007-11-29 11:29:30 · answer #7 · answered by absent farmer 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋