False,false,false and *drink*
2007-11-29 03:16:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by darwinsfriend3 AM 7
·
5⤊
0⤋
1- F, it's a little over 4 billion, 2-T, 3-F
----------------------------------------------------------
You answered your own question in number 2. All forms on life 'share a common and intentional design'- that's the very basis for why evolution is a certainty and no longer a theory. We share 98% of our genetic code with the monkey, 99% with the chimp, 75% with the fruitfly. I know you creationists like to brush right past this simple fact, if you had any idea how complex DNA is-- and us and a fruitfly have 75% of the same DNA making 75% and the same proteins that will do EXACTLY the same thing. We have the same stop codons and everything.
I can give you an example done a few years back. Where they took a PAX6 gene, it's located in BOTH humans and fruitflys, and one of its functions is to assist in forming an eye. They transplated it, taking the gene from a HUMAN, and putting it on the leg of the Drosophila (fruitfly), into adulthood the fruitfly developed an eye on his leg.
Evolution doesn't mean that the prior species' go suddenly extinct, moreover the earth is over 4 billion years old, so that being said maybe monkies will go extinct, humans too for that matter as your focusing in on a very short time frame.
And if you need any more of an arguement for evolution, how do you explain the vestigial leftovers in humans- the cecum, the appendix, webbed hands and toes, formations similar to scales and gils during the embryonic stage, wisdom teeth, a TAIL. Humans have all of these things at least during the embryonic stage of development, some people maintain some traits even, I knew someone with webbed feet. Why would humans have a tail or gils unless we evolved from a species that needed that to survive at some point?
2007-11-29 11:32:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
1 False ( written history goes back that far at least; the Old Testament covers it, and there are no reported sightings of a T-Rex in the Bible) Where did the Dinosaurs come from? Or go?
2 Maybe, but if all forms of life on earth share a common beginning, would that not be e v o lu shun ?? After all, if we all came from the same (amoeba/molecule/man/germ/woman) then someting made us EVOLVE into trees, fish, monkeys, horses and horsesa**es.
3 False the first human being on the planet was Randolph, and he lived in Garden City, New Jersey. He was really lazy and selfish and so, on May 12th, 4216 B.C. God deleted him from the system and rebooted with an upgrade to Adam (human 2.0). Unfortunately Adam (human 2.0) is also defective, so I anticipate God is going to delete us pretty soon too.
Everyone should read this answer soon as I have noticed that there a few people around here who:
1 have no sense of humor
or
2 are so weak in their convictions about God and religion that any thing like this threatens their peace of mind and they react with Godless fear and try to get rid ot it
2007-11-29 12:08:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
1,2,3 , No , No No .
The simple answer :
There are still monkeys of the same reasons there are still fireflys and Bicycles.
Humans evolved from a common ancestor of apes and other creatures .Picture two branches on a tree . One apes and one humans . Evolution takes billions of years and/or mutation to see drastic changes in a species . You would do well to read up on the principles of evolution before asking such a simple question .
EDIT for B"Quote : What if you pick the wrong "god" and the right one is waiting to send you to Hell ? Even the Bible states that god thinks better of non-believers than people who worship the wrong god .
2007-11-29 11:22:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by allure45connie 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I prefer to answer in terms of Vulcan or Cheesedip. Thus:
1. C
2. C
3. C
There is no such thing as a monkey. Give me some evidence!
2007-11-29 11:23:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
1) Very Unlikely
2) Unlikely
3) Very Unlikely
Humans did not develop from apes. We share a common ancestor. Asking "why are there still monkeys?" is like asking, "If I am related to my cousin, why does he still exist.?" We are related, not direct descendants.
2007-11-29 11:25:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by Kris G 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
1) False (4.5 Bn)
2) False (not intentional)
3) False (Name unknown, in Africa)
Evolution is divergent.
2007-11-29 13:32:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
1. F
2. F
3. F
The statement does not concur with current evolution theories...
2007-11-29 11:16:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
All false.
Its called a "common" ancestor. Go look up Hominid.
2007-11-29 11:18:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
1. F
2. F
3. F
Because we only share a small portion of our DNA with monkeys.
2007-11-29 11:16:46
·
answer #10
·
answered by Philosophicalme 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
If Your are right, I have nothing to lose....But if I'm right and you are wrong.....Matt.16:26 "For what will a man be profited , if he gains the whole world, and forfeits this soul? Or what will a man give in exchange for his soul? You would give up your soul just to be right?
2007-11-29 11:22:09
·
answer #11
·
answered by B"Quotes 6
·
0⤊
2⤋