Well, as a philosophy major, such definitions were my responsibility, so I'll give it a try.
That which is good has intrinsic value, not merely instrumental value. Instrumental values are always good FOR something, so good, by itself, is about intrinsic values.
After that, we go to the thesaurus (sorry I didn't keep that perfectly wonderful video about The Saurus. I'll look for it.) Anyway, here's what I get:
"virtuous, worthy, honorable, morally excellent, righteous, upright; honest, reliable, conscientious; moral, wholesome, praiseworthy, exemplary; religious, pious, devout, pure, innocent, unsullied, untainted. . ."
Well, there's a huge list, but perhaps the antonyms are more helpful: "bad, evil, wicked, sinful, dishonorable, immoral, dishonest, unreliable; unworthy, unwholesome, blamable; sullied, fallen, corrupt, corrupted, tainted; mean, cruel, unkind, ill-disposed, selfish. . ."
Sounds like it's another one of those highly subjective words, doesn't it? So the answer is no, I cannot define "good" for you; you must do that for yourself.
2007-11-29 03:26:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by auntb93 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
God described his creation as good.
---i never said that he said we were perfect, neither does the bible say we are perfect. There is no contradiction because you explicitly explained that you asked good not perfect
"All have sinned and fallen short of the glory of GOD"
2007-11-29 11:10:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by Michael 3
·
0⤊
0⤋