English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i am talking bout the scrubber used as the pollution controlled device.

2007-11-19 13:27:00 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Environment Green Living

3 answers

It's all relative. If the scrubber can be engineered to be run using waste heat, cooling/filtering water flow, etc, or co-powered using small amounts of existing energy inputs, than it could be considered efficient. If the operating costs outweigh the benefits, than it is not efficient.

This is a good argument for tax incentives for the utilization of green technology.

2007-11-19 13:33:03 · answer #1 · answered by benthic_man 6 · 0 0

It depends on how you define energy efficient. Any scrubbing is an extra that is not needed for whatever is being scrubbed to work, so in that sense it is just a waste. Scrubbing the smoke from a coal fired power plant can only reduce the energy efficiency of the plant for example. The best scrubber would use zero energy and have no effect at all on the energy efficiency of the power plant.

If you mean one scrubber removing the same pollution as another while using less energy, then that one is more energy efficient than the other. Or less wasteful. It depends on how you look at it.

2007-11-19 13:36:46 · answer #2 · answered by campbelp2002 7 · 0 0

wives or girlfriends are cheaper

2007-11-19 15:52:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers