"Americans know we have an illegal immigration problem. And most of us have a good idea about how to start fixing it -- secure our borders, and enforce the law," he says, adding "giving up, by granting amnesty is not the answer. It's unfair to those who have played by the rules and ignores the rule of law. It's also a matter of national security."
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/channel-08/2007/11/fred_thompson_wants_no_amnesty.html
2007-11-14 14:35:16 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
RON PAUL has been saying that for years.
What does Fred say about the North American Union? Does he know that the refusal to enforce immigration by the Administration is part of the plan for the North American Union? Does he know about the NAFTA Super Highway?
You need to check ronpaul2008.com.
2007-11-14 15:15:51 · answer #1 · answered by iraqisax 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Stick with Ron Paul....he has been against amnesty from the very start...as for Fred Thompson...he's ok...but I am always suspicious about someone who decides to declare a point in the middle of a race....
2007-11-14 14:48:42 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
Fred Thompson wants no amnesty so that he could get the votes of the other sector in the coming election.
VOTE for your choice as US President on my 360 degrees blog and know if Thompson will likely win.
2007-11-14 16:41:00 · answer #3 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
He's right of course, but hardly the first or only candidate to emphasize the need for enforcement. What's different about Fred's plan is that he wants to make things easier for those who do obey the law - what a concept! Go Fred!
2007-11-14 14:42:19 · answer #4 · answered by dukefenton 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
I don´t understand plenty approximately him. He does seem smarter than Bush, whether then somebody would desire to. He has a balloting checklist, and that i´m confident so as that they are able to come out in time. Then we can understand greater approximately him. actual I have been a Republican for some years, whether considering the fact that the non secular precise has taken over the celebration I´ve become greater of a Democrat. the hot Republicans seem to be greater previous testomony regulation. whilst Democrats seem to conform with greater the teachings of Jesus.
2016-12-16 09:04:47 · answer #5 · answered by snetsinger 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Within the Repub party you have several factions: No Amnesty-Pro life/Amnesty-Pro life/Amnesty-Pro choice, so Fred Thompson may corner the part that is No Amnesty, but depending on where he comes in on the Pro-life issue is going to decide whose votes he gets on that issue. It's really a mess at this point!
2007-11-14 14:40:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Fred was an actor.I hope and pray that Tom Tancredo gets the go ahead. He is true to his word and has stood by his word from the get go.
2007-11-14 19:08:01 · answer #7 · answered by Ms.L.A. 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Fred may just get him self elected if he is for shipping out all the illegals.. it is what Americans want.. the other candidates just can't seem to understand that.. I don't know if they are just stupid or they think they know more than the average prison.
Go Fred!!!
2007-11-14 14:49:14 · answer #8 · answered by Debra H 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
In the final analysis, the elections are going to center around economics. People vote with their pocketbooks. Most are concerned with inflation, and maybe a coming depression. They do not want to vote for someone who wants to raise taxes. This is where the Dems are losing, and they are going to have to start addressing it soon.
2007-11-14 14:50:39 · answer #9 · answered by Gretl 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Tom Tancredo or Duncan Hunter stand firm on this issue for a long time.I am going with one of them.
2007-11-14 15:12:24 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋