Out of all the drinking game questions I've ever read, this by far is the most baffling. (Yes, even above "If we comed from monkeyses, why is there still monkeyes?!?!?!"....
For starters, no one claims LOVE to be a physical or supernatural entity. Love has an explanation. And there are just so many other reasons this is idiotic, I'm not going to trouble myself pointing them out. I encourage the general Creationist community to, please, try and stop these people from making the rest of you look bad.
2007-11-14 09:04:59 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
That kind of argument could also be used to "prove" that aliens exist. Or leprachauns. Or fairies. Or ghosts. Or werewolves. Or vampires. Or dragons. Or unicorns.
It is simply used to avoid having to provide proof to back up any kind of claims.
Uhh. Fireball. Man can make it rain. Look up cloud seeding.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloud_seeding
2007-11-14 09:09:10 · answer #1 · answered by A.Mercer 7 · 6⤊ 1⤋
First off, there's is no such thing as a "monk-eye", only "monkey" :P.
Yes, it is kind of embarassing (good thing I'm not a fundie) to say those things. There is no true proof for existance or inexistance, since matter is neither created nor destroyed, it sorta contradicts the big bang theory.
I don't mind accepting the fact that go spawned evolution :P.
2007-11-14 09:12:20 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
True love is of God," For God so loved the world " John 3:16,
love is emotional, physical, and has a supernatural enity
which began with God
2007-11-14 09:45:26 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No one can convince you to believe anything you don't want to. But, I look at it this way- Electricity you can't see but you can see what it does. the same is with God you may not be able to see him but you can see all of the things he does. There is no way that anyone can expect me to believe that this universe and all of the humans and animals and plants just happened. Everything was created way to perfect. Plus I believe in the Bible because I have done much research and have found it to be both scientifically and historically accurate.
2007-11-14 09:19:27 · answer #4 · answered by Emily R 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
That argument is as valid as "We can't see the air but we know th air is there." No we can't see love, or air BUT those things are not an explanation to the universe. Therefore that's a stupid argument.
2007-11-14 09:51:33 · answer #5 · answered by Laughing all the way 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
That is a crazy argument. The real thing is that faith in an existing God is exactly what it is...faith. No need to try and prove anything! God reveals Himself to people everyday. Even people who USED to believe in evolution.
2007-11-14 09:17:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Excuse me, why are you equating creationists with everyone who believes in God? Creationists are a tiny portion of all the theists in the world. Were you directing this at the splinter group, the larger group, or just everybody in general?
2007-11-14 09:10:44 · answer #7 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
We may not know a lot about emotion but,they definitely exist.We know where they come from and some of the causes and effects.Because they can be studied, measured and affect everyone we know they exist.
2007-11-14 09:12:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, the painting requires a painter so creation requires a creator is much worse. It's like creationists don't know the difference between living and inanimate things.
2007-11-14 09:07:35 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Hmmm, let's see, I can't see gravity, thereby confirming the existence of a flying teapot. Makes perfect sense, no?
2007-11-14 09:22:06 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋