English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Why is this the last commandent?
I thought it was the most important

2007-11-14 07:48:03 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

19 answers

would you covet me Rebel?

2007-11-14 07:50:43 · answer #1 · answered by Hope 4 · 3 0

When that was first written down, women were the possession of a man, whether they were wives, mothers or daughters.
Men were never seen in the same way. I guess that they thought men needed the reminder and, possibly, all a woman could do is hanker and not steal away a husband.
It doesn't make sense. People haven't changed. I'm sure there were a lot of adulterous liaisons, regardless of the commandment. The first commandment is the most important.
And, surely, killing is worse than adultery.
C. :)!!

2007-11-14 10:26:00 · answer #2 · answered by Charlie Kicksass 7 · 0 0

Which would you say is the most difficult of the Big Ten to keep? Would it be the first, the commandment to believe in G-d? Faith doesn't come as easy to our generation as it did in the days of our grandparents. Children with aged parents suffering ill health and who require much attention might argue that the fifth commandment, "Honor your father and mother," is the most difficult to properly fulfill. Still others would say that the fourth commandment, to keep Shabbat, cramps their lifestyle more than any other.

While each has a valid point, personally, I would cast my vote for the last one on the list -- commandment number 10: Thou Shalt Not Covet.

"You shall not covet your friend's house; or his wife, servant, ox, donkey, or anything that belongs to your friend." Or in simple English, don't desire his beautiful home, stunning wife, dream job, nifty sports car or anything else that is his.

It's one thing not to steal the stuff; but not even to desire it? That's got to be the hardest of all. Really now, isn't G-d being somewhat unreasonable with this one? Is He being realistic? Surely He doesn't think we're angels -- He created us!

So allow me do what all good arguers do and try to answer a question with... another question. Why does the text of this commandment first list a variety of specifics -- house, wife, servant, etc. -- and then still finds it necessary to add the generalization, "and all that belongs to your friend"?

One beautiful explanation offered is that this comes to teach us a very important lesson for life -- a lesson which actually makes this difficult commandment much easier to carry out. What the verse is saying is that if perchance you should cast your envious eye over your neighbor's fence, don't only look at the specifics. Remember to also look at the overall picture.

Most of us tend to assume that the grass is greener on the other side. But we don't always consider the full picture, the whole package. So he's got a great business and a very healthy balance sheet. But is he healthy? Is his family healthy? His wife looks great at his side when they're out together, but is she such a pleasure to live with at home? And if he should have health and wealth, does he have pleasure from his children? Is there anybody who has it all?

Every now and then I find out something about someone whom I thought I knew well that reminds me of this lesson. A fellow who seemed to be on top of the world suddenly has the carpet pulled out from under his feet and in an instant is himself in need. Another guy whom I never really thought that highly of turns out to be an amazing father, raising the most fantastic kids.

As the jewish proverb goes, everybody has his own pekkel. We each carry a backpack through life, a parcel of problems, our own little bundle of troubles. When we are young, we think that difficulties are for "other people." When we get older we realize that no one is immune. Nobody has it all.

So if you find yourself coveting your fellow's whatever, stop for a minute to concider whether you really want "all that is your fellow's." When we actually see with our own eyes what the other fellow's life is all about behind closed doors, what's really inside his backpack, we will feel grateful for our own lot in life and happily choose our very own pekkel, with all its inherent problems.

There is a famous folk story about a group of villagers who formed a circle and each individual opened his sack, revealing his most precious possessions for all to see. They walked around the circle of open sacks and everyone had the opportunity to choose whichever one he wanted. In the end, each one chose his own.

The lord is giving us good advice. Be wise enough to realize that you've got to look at the whole picture. When we do, this difficult commandment becomes more easily observable. Not only is it sinful to envy what other people have; it's foolish. Because life is a package deal.

2007-11-14 08:03:05 · answer #3 · answered by fizzammm! 2 · 0 0

at the same time as that changed into first written down, women individuals were the possession of a guy, no matter if or not they were better halves, moms or daughters. adult men were never considered interior of a similar way. i wager that they concept adult men mandatory the reminder and, probably, all a woman might want to do is hanker and not scouse borrow away a husband. It would not make experience. human beings have not replaced. i'm positive there have been a variety of of adulterous liaisons, regardless of the commandment. the first commandment is the biggest. And, extremely, killing is worse than adultery. C. :)!!

2016-10-24 05:53:36 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

To covet anything is a sin.

It's not the most important commandment, but it is the most difficult one.

2007-11-14 08:01:15 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Obviously, yes. Otherwise God should've said, "Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's SPOUSE."

2007-11-14 07:50:56 · answer #6 · answered by . 6 · 1 0

You thought THAT was the most important commandment?

"Thou shalt not kill"?

Anyway, the bible/commandments aren't exactly PC. I would say they are meant to apply equally to men and women....If you believe in that sort of stuff.

2007-11-14 07:57:59 · answer #7 · answered by rbc_commish 3 · 0 0

Women aren't important in the bible, so it wasn't worth mentioning.
Oh well, I'll covet who I damn well want to covet....

2007-11-14 07:51:04 · answer #8 · answered by Nea 5 · 0 0

All of the commandments are important.

The commandment extends to women as well as men. After all, that's what equality is all about, ladies -- with equal rights comes equal responsibility.

..

2007-11-14 07:51:43 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

What if I covet both at the same time, is that ok?

2007-11-14 07:50:46 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Yes, as long as you covet him and act on it. Its way better than spilling your seed on the ground, which is punishable by death.

2007-11-14 07:50:36 · answer #11 · answered by ɹɐǝɟsuɐs Blessed Cheese Maker 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers