As far as I'm concerned, love and sex between any two people is excellent.
(Of course, between five it's fantastic!)
If everybody's consenting, and nobody's exploited, everything's fine.
CD
2007-11-14 07:05:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by Super Atheist 7
·
3⤊
2⤋
As long as neither person involved is in a position of power over the other and is forcing the involvement, I can't come up with a good argument against it. I do think that there should be a law against siblings having kids because it is harmful to the children, but adoption would be ok. I think it's kinda gross, but who am I to limit their lives?
2007-11-14 07:05:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by Eiliat 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
Reproduction has to play a role in this opinion. I can't support something that I think has great potential to cause harm.
2007-11-14 07:06:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by Let Me Think 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
That this is not the same thing in any way, shape or form. Unlike same sex marriage, incestuous marriage actually causes genetic defects that kill people.
Think about it.
2007-11-14 07:06:39
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
i don't think of that's being hypocritical. reason homosexuals as a team are being discriminated against era merely by using fact they opt for to have intercourse with somebody that's not opposite their very very own gender. That discrimination consists of over to adoptions, some jobs, giving blood, and so on. that's fairly not hassle-free in any respect as they might't help from feeling and loving how they do. the place as with consensual polgamy which isn't consistently that consensual while investigations are completed, and in spite of sibling/kin member marriages which additionally are consensual are greater or much less marriages produced from organic determination on the persons areas most of the time. So in one way or yet another they don't could join the polygamist marriage or sibling/kin member marriage in any respect in the event that they actually had to. by using fact they weren't born to certainly want polygamy or to be married/fall in love with a kin member. they are additionally not being dealt with as 2nd classification voters for their determination. I mean polygamy is a criminal offense and what not. yet i'm fairly valuable that as quickly as people bypass away that existence style they might nevertheless get on with their lives and not be denied the desirable to marry oftentimes in the event that they had to. they might nevertheless undertake in the event that they opt for to as properly. or maybe for people who marry their kin, they might evoke a ill feeling from people by using fact of their determination. yet back they too are not outrightly discriminated against as harshly as homosexuals that desire to be married are. So yea, the way you experience isn't probably all that hypocritical as you likely already knew the different stuff that i discussed approximately the two different varieties of marriage to be authentic. The injustice in how comparable intercourse marriage is being dealt with is what makes you help it over the different varieties you pronounced. And in my opinion i think in addition as you do, by using fact it style of feels like while you at the instant are not element of a discriminated classification of persons or minorities, you could fairly lots destroy out with something in this usa. that's fairly unhappy yet how the U.S. runs at situations.
2016-09-29 05:55:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by nason 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, saying it doesn't matter opens that door as well as the door to plural marriages. Just let everyone do what they want. They'll have their day with God.
2007-11-14 07:11:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
So what's the logic that says incestuous sex is bad and homosexual sex is good?
2007-11-14 07:06:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by Thom 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
I think its really disgusting and immoral. I'm all for same sex marriage but incestuous just grosses me out uck!!
2007-11-14 07:03:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Yeah sure why not.
I am personally not into it but if they want to they should be allowed to so long as both parties are willing.
2007-11-14 07:06:01
·
answer #9
·
answered by The Bassline Libertine 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
So, what are you proposing to do about the inevitable reproduction? Forced abortions?
Surely, we don't want to go there...................
2007-11-14 07:15:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by fanofchan 6
·
3⤊
0⤋