it uses too many eths eths everywhere, it feels convoluted and hard to understand. i prefer the regular english bible thank u very much
2007-11-14 03:24:14 · 11 answers · asked by elle4 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
You do understand the concept of this website don't you?
You ask questions. You don't give your useless opinion.
2007-11-14 03:30:17 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The "blunders" you cite on your letter on the concern of the unique King James version were typographical no longer having any element to do with content textile.The printing press changed into new then and definite typesetters did misspell words. This changed into for this reason corrected. get your info immediately... The Apocrypha books were no longer considered to be divinely inspired so were never protected. i have study them and that i agree. Christians who've extremely researched "different variations" can no longer help yet come to the top that the King James version is the most real and good version.Now there's a"new kjv bible NKJV out" that's a wolf in sheep's clothing, i do no longer trust it. I persist with the 1611 Kjv.i'd inspire each person to in my view study the various bibles to work out for themselves why we must be very discerning on which version we opt for.once you spot the ameliorations you'd be as taken aback as i changed into. the internet has many good web pages that would want to help you on your experience. might want to your eyes be opened too;
2016-10-24 05:33:09 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the KJV is the version lest played around with. The other versions have been translated too much. Id rather know the most original Bible.
2007-11-14 03:37:50 · answer #3 · answered by Michael C 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Here we go again protestants following in the footsteps of the reformers each has the correct version the other is going to hell
2007-11-14 03:30:26 · answer #4 · answered by Benny 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the Modern King James Version is not bad to read.
2007-11-14 03:31:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree much easier to read the NIV or new english bible translations.
2007-11-14 03:31:37 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, I have used the KJV for many years. I still use it and love it but I now primarily use the ESV.
god bless
2007-11-14 03:31:35 · answer #7 · answered by happy pilgrim 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It contains truth none the less, you might try the NKJV.
2007-11-14 03:28:32 · answer #8 · answered by ? 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
To each his on!
2007-11-14 03:27:47 · answer #9 · answered by Jeancommunicates 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
OK, what was the question?
2007-11-14 03:28:14 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋