I think you buck the human notions that God caused useless conflicts and wars; it was not God, it was the mind of man. Human beings really can be and really do cause wars within their own minds. There really are evil people who enjoy trying to become the "lord" over all the people. There are selfish people who really do try to conquer other people. These are unholy and ungodly people.
If the attempt is to "assasinate erronous concepts about God" then that is another matter entirely. Our Loving Father, God is eternal and can not die, God is spirit and can not be assasinated in reality... which would be a worse thing to attempt than even what Lucifer did when he tried to proclaim he was god and that God the Father did not exist.
Actual attempted assasination of God is suicidal to one's eternal life...and this is because to deny God's existence consistently, with full intention, and with complete insistence, and with complete identification as there being no God, such an unreality-identified and sin-identified mortal is unlikely to ever change their mind or to ever desire to know the truth. And here are the determining factors of whether such a soul would actually survive past death:
""Evil is the unconscious or unintended transgression of the divine law, the Father's will. Evil is likewise the measure of the imperfectness of obedience to the Father's will.
"Sin is the conscious, knowing, and deliberate transgression of the divine law, the Father's will. Sin is the measure of unwillingness to be divinely led and spiritually directed.
"Iniquity is the willful, determined, and persistent transgression of the divine law, the Father's will. Iniquity is the measure of the continued rejection of the Father's loving plan of personality survival and the Sons' merciful ministry of salvation.
"By nature, before the rebirth of the spirit, mortal man is subject to inherent evil tendencies, but such natural imperfections of behavior are neither sin nor iniquity. Mortal man is just beginning his long ascent to the perfection of the Father in Paradise. To be imperfect or partial in natural endowment is not sinful. Man is indeed subject to evil, but he is in no sense the child of the evil one unless he has knowingly and deliberately chosen the paths of sin and the life of iniquity. Evil is inherent in the natural order of this world, but sin is an attitude of conscious rebellion which was brought to this world by those who fell from spiritual light into gross darkness."
" In any universe contest between actual levels of reality, the personality of the higher level will ultimately triumph over the personality of the lower level. This inevitable outcome of universe controversy is inherent in the fact that divinity of quality equals the degree of reality or actuality of any will creature. Undiluted evil, complete error, willful sin, and unmitigated iniquity are inherently and automatically suicidal. Such attitudes of cosmic unreality can survive in the universe only because of transient mercy-tolerance pending the action of the justice-determining and fairness-finding mechanisms of the universe tribunals of righteous adjudication."
"Be not deceived; God is not mocked, for whatsoever a man sows that shall he also reap." True, even in the justice of reaping the harvest of wrongdoing, this divine justice is always tempered with mercy. Infinite wisdom is the eternal arbiter which determines the proportions of justice and mercy which shall be meted out in any given circumstance. The greatest punishment (in reality an inevitable consequence) for wrongdoing and deliberate rebellion against the government of God is loss of existence as an individual subject of that government. The final result of wholehearted sin is annihilation. In the last analysis, such sin-identified individuals have destroyed themselves by becoming wholly unreal through their embrace of iniquity. The factual disappearance of such a creature is, however, always delayed until the ordained order of justice current in that universe has been fully complied with.
Cessation of existence is usually decreed at the dispensational or epochal adjudication of the realm or realms. On a world such as [earth] Urantia it comes at the end of a planetary dispensation. Cessation of existence can be decreed at such times by co-ordinate action of all tribunals of jurisdiction, extending from the planetary council up through the courts of the Creator Son to the judgment tribunals of the Ancients of Days. The mandate of dissolution originates in the higher courts of the superuniverse following an unbroken confirmation of the indictment originating on the sphere of the wrongdoer's residence; and then, when sentence of extinction has been confirmed on high, the execution is by the direct act of those judges residential on, and operating from, the headquarters of the superuniverse.
When this sentence is finally confirmed, the sin-identified being instantly becomes as though he had not been. There is no resurrection from such a fate; it is everlasting and eternal. The living energy factors of identity are resolved by the transformations of time and the metamorphoses of space into the cosmic potentials whence they once emerged. As for the personality of the iniquitous one, it is deprived of a continuing life vehicle by the creature's failure to make those choices and final decisions which would have assured eternal life. When the continued embrace of sin by the associated mind culminates in complete self-identification with iniquity, then upon the cessation of life, upon cosmic dissolution, such an isolated personality is absorbed into the oversoul of creation, becoming a part of the evolving experience of the Supreme Being. Never again does it appear as a personality; its identity becomes as though it had never been.
2007-11-14 03:20:40
·
answer #1
·
answered by Holly Carmichael 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If Smith & Wesson makes guns, and in turn, a criminal shoots someone with a Smith & Wesson gun, then by cause and effect, Smith & Wesson shot someone. While both situations do have, what are called, "background causes" in common, the result still directly stems from a more immediate cause (Satan and the criminal). It's also like a person who beats his/her child. The abuser may have been abused as a child, so, by background cause, we could in fact blame the abuser's parents. However, the abuser must still be held responsible. Another situation: Where I live, the local government is starting to hold parents responsible for teen drinking. This isn't to say that the kids are getting off without punishment, but the background cause is also being addressed. In other words, you CAN pin blame on background causes, but the immediate cause should receive most of the blame.
2016-05-23 03:20:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by margurite 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
There are so many things wrong with your assumption. First, if God is omnipotent, omniscient and omnipresent, then you would not be able to kill Him if you tried and He would know about it before you tried. God can't be killed, it is part of the definition of God.
Second, you assume that God is the root of all evil. Where do you get that notion? It is the absence of God that is the root of all evil. True, people fight over the concept of God but it is precisely the absence of true worship in their lives that prompts them to such evil doings. How can we hurt one another if we truly preach, teach and live according to His command to love one another? They are the antithesis of each other. Thus, all the fighting you see in the world is not because of God but despite God. Human weaknesses being what they are, we exercise our agency in wicked, selfish ways contrary to God's teachings. If we obeyed Him, we would do away with fighting, wars, useless conflicts and annoying arguing on R&S.
2007-11-14 03:08:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by rac 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
haha, yes we would. Man has blamed God since the Garden of Eden, your just doing the same thing. Not everything is done out of the name of a religion
2007-11-14 03:00:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by Balla 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
... The current lack of god begs to differ.
Religion there is.
War there is.
Useless conflict there is.
Annoying people arguing on R&S there are.
God there is not.
Funny that.
2007-11-14 03:01:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by Lucid Interrogator 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
What's up with the "attempted assasination"?
What's your Scriptural basis for that?
2007-11-14 02:59:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Man cannot assassinate God, God is and ever shall be. We can assassinate ourselves by not following his commandments.
I did use spell check, but it just couldn't help me on this one
2007-11-14 03:14:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by June smiles 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
ARE YOU SERIOUS? REALLY? We're asking questions this dumb now? Ok here's an equally dumb answer.
A Blessing.
2007-11-14 03:01:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
if god were dead, so would every living thing that is sustained by his energy...
2007-11-14 03:00:16
·
answer #9
·
answered by az-bandit 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Honestly, it is you that will be dead. Why would you want to die? I pray for you!
2007-11-14 02:59:42
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋