Are TV evangelists an example of taking something free and selling it to the poor?

Question

What are your thoughts about this?

Answer 1

Depends greatly on the TV evangelist. I knew a neighbor of mine who was a bedridden old woman. She had no family that ever seemed to come by, but her face and demeanor was always full of joy. Her only companion were TV evangelists. Some of those she watched I had great issues with. Others were very respected.
Paul took note of this attitude in his letter to the Philippians. He concluded...
"What then? Only that in every way, whether in pretense or in truth, Christ is preached; and in this I rejoice, yes, and will rejoice."

Remember, it was a poor widow who gave all that she had to the greedy, dishonest Pharisees at the Temple. Did Jesus remark on how dishonest the Pharisees were in ripping off the poor widow? No, He saw what the Father always sees--the heart of the giver, and the reward she has obtained that would never be corrupted.

This is a good lesson on where we should place our focus. Greedy televangelists have their reward. Rather, let's focus on our own giving and rejoice with those who give out of a generous and loving heart.

Answer 2

with out commenting on the justifications of television Evangelists you ought to guage the myth of the widows mite. at the same time as that's unlucky that there have been circumstances of television Evangelists exploiting the undesirable, the myth shows that God values the present of the undesirable widow and could bless them for it no matter if the money changed into misappropriated by ability of an unscrupulous evangelist. The Lesson (or Parable) of the widow's mite is a narrative present interior the Synoptic Gospels (Mark 12:38-40 4, Luke 20:40 5-40 seven,21:a million-4), in which Jesus is training on the Temple in Jerusalem, and condemns the Pharisees for his or her educate of wealth, ostentation, and self importance. Witnessing the donations made by ability of the wealthy adult men, Jesus highlights how a nasty widow donates in difficulty-free words 2 mites, the least useful money accessible on the time, yet that this changed into each and every thing she had to her call, at the same time as any human beings supply in difficulty-free words a small element of their own wealth. The Gospel of Mark specifies that a mite changed into worth lower than a quadrans, the smallest Roman coin, implying that Mark's meant target market were extra attentive to Roman custom than with Jewish. a present ought to to be judged no longer by ability of its absolute fee, yet by ability of the way it compares extremely; that it is not the impressiveness or identifying to purchase potential which concerns, yet what it ability.

Answer 3

The ones I'm familiar with like Joel Osteen, Creflo Dollar and that lady with the pink hair and pounds of makeup are not your ideal teachers because these folks have 2 rolls royces, PRIVATE JETS and live in mega mansions so the hypocrisy of Jesus's humble teachings just screams out at me......

there may be some who have much more humility like Charles Stanley (maybe) but there are certainly some like Mother Angelica (is she considered an evangelist b/c she had her own show) who when she speaks you can tell she's not reciting some rehearsed speech she wrote about God, you can tell she speaks and her knowledge comes from the depths of her soul, she's the type that gets goosebumps talking about Jesus and I admire her

Answer 4

I think that some TV evangelists are just trying to get gods message out on a global level and asking for donations does help to fund the telecast. However, there are those who try to sell you healing oils and blessed cloths to heal you and crap. Just know the good from the bad.

Answer 5

Yes. Jesus and his disciples used the one-on-one, one heart at a time approach. People knew them, related to them and trusted them.

Televangelists are not in touch with their "followers" at all. They just look at the red light on the camera. They never see 98% of the people who send them money...and they never seek them either.

A person may be brought to Christ through a televangelist's preaching, but that person will need personalised, one-on-one teaching, discipling and care if they want to grow in the Lord and learn.

And I don't believe that watching TV for an hour a week replaces participating in the life of a congregation. Maybe if a person is bedridden or severely handicapped and can't get out, it can help--but local pastors should be looking after their needs, too.

Answer 6

Billy Graham is the exception IMO. I believe he is honestly trying to help people. But your average TV evangelist is probably out to make a buck.

Answer 7

Some tv evangelists are there to get rich and some really want to spread the gospel. Check out 3ABN.ORG that is a great station that never has telethons and has alot of great truth and gospel on their programs 24/7.

Answer 8

TV evangelists are an example of con-men suckering the life savings out of gullible people.
.

Answer 9

People of all economic standing donate to televangelists. Sometimes there are gifts that are offered for a donation. Many people cant go to church, so there is a need for televangelists. I know that not all are reputable, you should pray and ask God to direct you to the right one. Even if some misuse the profit, the word of God will not return void.

Answer 10

I have never thought of it that way, I think that it is true!
It is like bottled water, isn't it? Used to be able to drink water for free, now you pay for it.
Will air be next? Only if someone can think of a way.