Republicans: If Al Gore threw a globe into his winter fireplace, would you FINALLY believe in global warming?

Question

The Antarctica is boiling now. When are you going to panic and stop using your blowtorches to weld? How can you be soooo blind???!!

Answer 1

If he really believed in global warming he wouldn't have a carbon footprint as big as my whole neighborhood. Everyone hates a hypocrite.

Answer 2

First of all, how does throwing a globe into his fireplace prove anything?
Second, Antarctica is NOT boiling, it's actually quite chilly down there.
Third, using a blowtorch to weld is NOT going to make the whole stinkin planet warmer.
And fourth, I am not blind.

As for your extremely broad statement that ALL Republicans are "deniers" of "global warming," it just shows one of the real points of the theory. Democrats have latched onto this theory and have hyped it up so that they will get elected. It's working, I guess.
I'll tell you why I don't believe global warming is a threat to anyone. Because I've RESEARCHED both sides of the debate (and, by the way, there still are two sides), and I can see how weak, speculative, or just plain WRONG the science behind the theory of anthropogenic global warming is. I've seen Al Gore's movie, read his book, and read magazine articles by other scientists supporting him, but I've also read a ton of stuff arguing against him. The arguments that say that we really don't know what is causing this MODERATE level of warming, but carbon dioxide is probably not the culprit are so much more convincing. They use ACTUAL measured scientific data, instead of predictions from shaky, unreliable computer models and rhetoric to prove their point.
For example, studies show that only 2% of all the gases in the atmosphere is CO2, and only a tiny 0.054% of THAT is anthropogenic. If you calculate that out, only ONE TENTH of a percent (0.001%) is manmade CO2. Now that's one inconvenient truth that Al Gore decided not to tell us, isn't it?

Go to this link:
http://www.cei.org/pdf/ait/app.pdf
and just START reading what the author has to say. It completely overturns all of Gore's arguments.

Another great source is "The Great Global Warming Swindle," available on YouTube. If you really pay attention to what is being said, you'll see that you don't need to panic either.

Answer 3

Only if he follows it in.

Look, if even Al Gore BELIEVED this crap, would he be flying around in a private jet creating a carbon footprint, as he puts it, the size of a small nation's?
Think. There's big money to be made in this Global Warming scare... from Al's bogus "Carbon Offsets" to the enormous sums that GE stands to make (and the reason they have a lobbying budget that dwarfs that of all major oil companies combined) from the ensuing panic as the uninformed rush to do whatever they are told will help...

Just the fact that you say "The Antarctica" (like Ms. South Carolina with The Iraq) and then say it's boiling show you have no idea what you're talking about. Research... then ask.

Answer 4

Everyone knows global warming is happening. That's not the problem the problem is how, man or natural cycle. That's what I don't like about you Pro AGW people. You talk down to anyone who has a different opinion. It's like the damn Salem Witch trials. You people aren't any different. There's other factors that could be at play you won't recognize them b/c your narrow minded. The skeptics for the most part see AGW as possible and see that others factors could be at work. The sun for example. Read these three articles and then tell me that the sun could not be a factor.

http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/sun_output_030320.html

http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/solarsystem/sun_weather_010828-1.html

http://www.oar.noaa.gov/spotlite/archive/spot_sunclimate.html

So you cannot not rule out the sun. Here's an example. The sun's output and the sea surface temps are in correlation meaning the sun has warmed the oceans for the past century or so. The warming oceans cause more CO2 to be released from the oceans. See man is only responsible for .06% of the total amount of CO2 released on earth. Meaning nature releases the remaining 99.94%. So we do not know that the .06% is the breaking point or not. So if CO2 is a driving factor of climate then then the sun helped the ocean release more CO2 which will also cause more heat to be trapped in the earth's atmosphere. That's if you believe CO2 is a driving factor of climate. Here's one thing that I don't like about CO2. . In the first 30 feet of the atmosphere, on the average, outward radiation from the Earth, which is what CO2 is supposed to affect, how much [of the reflected energy] is absorbed by water vapor? In the first 30 feet, 80 percent, okay? ...: And how much is absorbed by carbon dioxide? Eight hundredths of one percent. One one-thousandth as important as water vapor. You can go outside and spit and have the same effect as doubling carbon dioxide. This statement came from Reid Bryson, Emeritus Professor and founding chairman of the University of Wisconsin Department of Meteorolog (now the Department of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences). So many scientist believe that water vapor is much more important than CO2 as far as the greenhouse effect goes. So what I'm trying to say is that you cannot rule out the sun. That's the problem with all the Pro Anthropogenic Global Warming people of the world. They won't recognize other information to factor into there beliefs. I recognize both sides and take everything into consideration. That's how science works.

Answer 5

this is greater of an exaggeration than a lie. Pumping fossil fuels and whatnot into the ambience is having a damaging impact on earth (impacts on climate, increasing the fee of extinction, melting arctic ice, and so on), despite the fact that this is not the "we will all be ineffective in 30 years!" undertaking that many are making it out to be. "worldwide warming" is somewhat bit a misnomer besides, because of the fact the flair long-term outcomes have greater to do with vast flooding and severe climate kinds than an standard advance in international temperature. long tale short, i'm skeptical a pair of lot of it, yet i does no longer throw the toddler out with the bathwater only yet. this is somewhat confusing to forget approximately with regard to the drastic boost interior the fee at which arctic ice is melting, which has coincided with the upward thrust contained in using fossil fuels. in case you war by using all the propaganda, you will locate that there is a few actuality to all of it. In different words, do no longer pay attention to politicians, locate out what actual scientists ought to assert with regard to the problem. there's a reasonably great distinction between Al Gore "the international is doomed!" worldwide warming, and the actual information.

Answer 6

How can you be so blind to believe the likes of Al Gore?

Skepticism is required in the global warming debate. It is buried in political and economic agenda. Much to our dismay, such agendas distort data and the conclusions drawn from the data.

You exercise to much blind faith in science, the scientist and politicians. Your view is very narrow minded indeed.

Open your mind a bit more.

Better question: when will democrats stop screwing everyone over with higher taxes and socialism!!

Answer 7

It's climate change. I don't believe in global warming. The climate has been changing since the beginning of time. I think that global warming folks are afraid of change of any kind. Companies are making money off of global warming. It's nothing more than scare tactics by the environmentalists.

Answer 8

Antarctica is boiling now? Care to prove it?

Oh, by the way, it is summertime in the southern hemisphere.

I really hope you're just being sarcastic.

Answer 9

al gore is wrong and he only uses one type of information!
yes global wraming is happening but it could but natural with us just speeding it up!
look at the facts before being nasty!

Answer 10

Send me all of your money and I will stop boiling Antarctica.