Isn't it funny that Creationists and Evolutionists are both absolutely sure that they are right?

Question

I just find this kind of funny... I mean, someone has to be wrong.

I'm a Creationist, by the way. : )

Answer 1

I think everyone missed the point of your question!!! You asked if it was funny that they are both so sure they are right!!

My answer is... We disagree... and that's normal. But most of you guys that answered didn't actually read the question, just used it as an excuse to put your side forward!!!

Take care, God bless

Answer 2

"A concept is a hypothesis of an journey or factor with out any definitive data." not somewhat. A concept is the hypothesis that maximum suitable debts for the observations. "With each and all of the medical documents accessible technological awareness can be sure that the enormous Bang began all of it. Scientists, besides the actuality that they might individually have self assurance it, all agree that it remains non the less a concept." of course. it could by no potential be something different 'greater' than a concept. there is not any better graduation element that a concept can attain. No quantity of information could make any concept a actuality. that could be like announcing that an rather stable orange ought to sooner or later exchange into an apple. "the two creationism and the enormous Bang have not have been given any valid data." beneficial, while you're allergic to know-the way it probably seems that way. "might or not this is honest to declare that no person is familiar with for beneficial and not utilising a shadow of a doubt who or what created all of it and why we are right here?" confident! that's why technological awareness would not declare one hundred% data! the comparable can not be reported approximately maximum religions...

Answer 3

I am also constantly amazed at the anger this debate stirs up. I am not on either side of the arguement personally. I am not threatened by knowledge, be it spiritually driven or scientifically driven.
We aren't sure where the Aesir originally came from. We don't even know the names of the other "firsts" that came with Odin. That is as vital information to the Asatru as the Adam and Eve story, but we don't know and I'm okay with that! I don't have to know everything about the past. Curiosity tends to become a curse that follows people to the grave. I am more interested in the present/future.
IF only we would put that determination and vigor into changing other people's minds about important things like preserving our freedom and our enviornment for future generations... instead of waving a book of theories around and stubbornly shouting "I AM RIGHT."

Answer 4

Actually, I'm more sure that you're idea that the universe was created by a specific divine being in 6 days is wrong than I am that evolution is 100% correct. In fact I do not believe at all that big bang theory, abiogenesis, evolution or even gravity theory are 100% accurate but they're the best we have at the moment and I'd rather go with that than attempting to explain it imaginatively.

Answer 5

Actually, the strict evolutionist (I count myself among them) are NOT absoutely sure that evolution is correct. All theories are provisional. However, since the evidence is so abundantly in favor of evolution and against creationism, the provisional theory of evolution is a much more reasonable explanation.

And by the same token of skeptical inquiry, we also tend to reject supernatural causes. Quite reasonable. But you're right, the silly conviction of creationists (and especially when disguised as ID) are rather amusing. Mostly. Except for the death threats.

Answer 6

Evolution is strongly supported by masses of evidence. Scientists are still not "absolutely sure" they are right, though. Nothing is even considered to be absolutely proven in science. It is proven beyond reasonable doubt, though.

On the other hand, creationists are absolutely sure they are right, and that is funny, as they have no evidence whatsoever!

Answer 7

belet: did you do any research before coming to that conclusion? there are some arguments, such as the lack of intermediates. But you can just zone me out because its not like you have to listen to opposition.

some pix: how are creationists against muslims, hindus? are you saying that if people are opposed by many they are wrong?

oh really simon t? you say creationism is wrong? i guess i just have to believe that.

indrajeet: that is your own belief. Most religions are against the others.

As for myself... there's a lot of one upping going on, and evolutionists have not always been completely honest.

Answer 8

Darwin didn't claim to know the very origins of life. RELIGION made it a battle by picking out one small part of it developed years later and made it a political battlefield

There are thousands if not tens or hundreds of thousands pieces of evidence to support the existence of evolution. Yet, just cause of one possible "conclusion" that was made separately from the original theory, it's completely ignored.

Answer 9

Yeah it's like the Creationists vs the Muslims, the Creationists vs the Hindus, the Creationists vs the Buddhists, the Creationists vs the pro-abortionists and also like the evolutionists vs the....heck this only happens to the Creationists.

HINT HINT.

Answer 10

There's only one reason to be very very sure of something in science, and that's if there's a whole lot of evidence to back up whatever theory you're sure about.

Hence most scientists' support of evolution. Although any credible scientist will admit that nothing can ever be proven 100%.

Answer 11

You are right. One of us has to be wrong.

I have bad news for you, Creationists are wrong.

There is millions of pieces of evidence for evolution. Care to produce one piece of evidence for creationism that is accepted by a respected life scientist?

So, either evolution is right, or there is a vast conspiracy amongst thousands of scientists and teachers that has remained unexposed for over a hundred years. This 'lie' also managed to persuade the scientific community that believed something different. If it is so patently false how did the idea gain traction in the first place.


Kind of funny? I find your ability to stick your head in the sand and ignore reality absolutely hilarious.