No - that's ridiculous. Birth control is a great thing - it keeps unwanted children from coming into the world, and children have a right to be wanted. Condoms in particular can save lives, and anyone who opposes the use or distribution of condoms is contributing to mass murder. AIDS is real and it's preventable.
No, fetuses are not yet alive. They have the potential to become alive, but it should be the mother's choice as to whether to allow that to happen. A woman's sexual and reproductive autonomy should be sacred and absolute because she serves the life force by risking her life so others can live. That should never be forced - it's too important.
2007-11-13 16:27:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by Morgaine 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Some types of birth control do in fact destroy innocent life by acting as abortificients, so would "murder" defenseless preborn infants, by causing the death of the human embryo.
Self pleasuring and other forms of birth control cannot constitute murder, because no conception is involved in the process, so no innocent life is wasted ... unless or until the chosen primary method of birth control fails.
A good case can be made that birth control is quite likely the great deception that leads the whole world into serious error, since God is not likely to continue forever to overlook the murder of the estimated 40,000,000 innocent preborn souls that are typically aborted each year, all around the world.
2007-11-13 17:06:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't see how self-pleasuring can be considered murder. There has to be the joining of a sperm and egg to even consider the debate in the first place. Otherwise, it can't be a murder. Only one of thousands of sperm actually get to fertilize the egg, the rest die trying. Does that mean that a man and woman should be put on trial for several thousand counts of attempted murder?
Birth control basically prevents conception, and again, there's no life there, so at worst, it's 'attempted murder' but in my mind, since again no fetus was created, there shouldn't be any debate.
2007-11-13 16:23:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by Bach 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Birth control is pervention of a possible life, not putting an end to it. Self pleasure is.. well "self" no possibility for life to occur there. - If we are going to go down the "spilling of seed" route then everytime a woman ovulates and doesn't become pregant is she sinning? It is a possible wasted life afterall...
If a fetus needs a life certificate wouldn't it also need a death certificate when miscarried? Talk about raising the mortality rate.
2007-11-13 23:52:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
As Monty Python has sang... "Every Sperm Is Sacred"
Given that "perspective", yes, birth control and self-pleasure would be "murder" as all those potential "lives" would be "wasted". That's why the Catholic Church frowns upon condom usage and masturbation.
2007-11-13 16:16:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by ZER0 C00L ••AM••VT•• 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
You were once a fetus. Aren't you glad your mother didn't have you murdered?
2007-11-13 17:36:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by Sweet Suzy 777! 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
My answers are "no" and "no."
http://i209.photobucket.com/albums/bb62/Randall_Fleck/Orang_talk_2_GIF.gif
[][][] r u randy? [][][]
.
2007-11-13 17:24:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋