English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

19 answers

This is not by Muslim invaders but scholars and you have full right to debate on this issue. These are hindus who failed to defend academically.

2007-11-13 15:51:17 · answer #1 · answered by Happily Happy 7 · 4 6

Muslims did this muslim did that what happen to u all ...
Y would a religion degrade another ... the only problem with u all is that ur pissed off and doesn't know what ISlam is and their principals are.
U just are barking without knowing anything..

When muslims invaded india. Was india the same as we see today..
Their were kings rule and and the situation was worse than anyone can imagine ...
Muslims were also aghast on seeing this ...It was also true that there was abundance of wealth in india but ignorance of Humanity. Muslims never forced anyone their religion on India...But it is also true they presented their religion to them and their principles..They ruled india as they would have ruled other places.. With their law or Sharia ...and have imposed tax system too for non- Muslim (Though it was said Mughals stated the tax system for non muslims) But it was clear they never forced anyone into their religion . Their administration was finest among indian History ( Shersha Suri) .. the result Majority of people is Hindu today and after Partition tooo only 4-5% people migrated from india to pakistan and Bangladesh the proof is the population of present muslims in india is high than them (almost)

U Guys just take High and leave Muslims to themselves u don't have the rigth to say aboutthem when uself don't know anything...
I would elaborate details about Invasion of muslims and what did they do for india .......But i know u won't digest all this ..
There is saying in HINDi :
" BHAINS KE AAGE BEENJ BAJANA"

2007-11-16 01:13:08 · answer #2 · answered by Ambulance Chaser 2 · 0 1

Actually there is something wrong with the Muslim psyche, in that the religion is not code of conduct only. It is a thing to be spread by hook or crook.
Because of cast system in India, the society was not organised enough till very recently to combate Islam. But due to the experiment of social engineering under taken by various organisations, the Hindus have started organising on religious level. This has completely changed the demographic pattern of vote bank politics, and defiant mood by hindus would not leave any scope for Muslims to denigrade Hindus any further.

2007-11-14 01:16:13 · answer #3 · answered by Panchal J 4 · 3 1

Every invader tries to denigrate the culture of the conquered. Muslims have invaded Muslim country as well as other countries with different religion (Iraq invading Kuwait). Christians did the same things, two world wars to prove it. People invade for power, they use any means to subjugate the defeated people for some time. Then the conquered people rise up and establish themselves.
Religion is one of the means of destroying the culture of subjugated people. Generally invaders have lower values and lower cultures. It is like thugs and goondas have lesser culture than the people they ravish. These thugs want to show off their physical strength at the expense of their victims. There is no honor among thieves.

2007-11-14 10:49:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Propagating a religion can be done by force or by convincing others.

Capitalism and ruling over other nations helped the Britishers, the Spanish and the French to spread Christianity.

It was the same path which the Islamic rulers followed, when they conquered Iran, Iraq, Mongolia, Afghanistan and India.

The other way is to talk to people which the missionaries do.

2007-11-14 13:19:52 · answer #5 · answered by Ash66 3 · 0 1

This is law of nature. If a rich culture followers are unable to defend their great heritage, it is attacked by barbarians and destroyed

Secular hindus are more responsible for downfall of hinduism than muslims.

2007-11-15 04:38:29 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

yes they have done so in the past and are still doing so
but Sanatana Dharma is bound to resurface again..these small small things which are happening as a part of the numerous inevitable things that are destined to happen in kaliyuga-they wont and cant really make any real difference to Hinduism since Sanatana Dharma is the eternal religion.And budhdhism, Jainism, Sikhism are what but parts of Hinduism -what one my call offshoots

When time comes things will set themselves right again

2007-11-14 10:37:10 · answer #7 · answered by Aradhana 6 · 2 1

Islam is the purest religion there is, it's a peaceful religion..i know you all know that but still you need to talk crap, for those who believe that Islam encourages violence against the non Muslims until they become followers, you are way wrong. I'm a Muslim and i don't really care if you become Muslims or not, to be a Muslim is a blessing from god, if god doesn't chose you to be Muslim, i can't go against his will,so all the guys who gets their facts from websites about "Islam" made by haters and racists, don't be scared it only normal to hear from a religion from one that actually believes in it.

i can go on endlessly talking about Hinduism and Sikhism and say that they worship rats and cows...but i won't fall that low, because i respect my knowledge and say : "i don't know" when i actually i don't know anything about something.

2007-11-14 10:25:40 · answer #8 · answered by MoRmEx 5 · 2 3

I am not here to defend any religion ,,, i was just reading the Answer's and i saw lot of people Lieing abt our History and i shd Inform them abt the truth....
1st thing Islam dint Rule India for 800year's ... they tried to come into India in 8th centuary and for nearly 700 year's they had to fight and then India came under Mughal rule..
( most of india was under Mughal rule most ....not all)
so the people who are saying Muslime's ruled India for 800year is a lie and false clam..
Ruling and having control of whole of india for 800 year's is diffrent from fighting them for 700year's
shivaji was fighting aginest Mughal rule till 1760 so where does the question come's that mughal's ruled India for 800 yar's???
U can read Indian History it will be same, i cant change it,,,,,,

and comming to people saying , "If Mughal where really bad ,y there are only 20% Muslime's in India..... again they are lieing...... they are seeing current india i,e after independence
pakistan, afghanistan and banghladesh where part of india. and if u compair and put pakistan afghanistan and bangladesh muslime population then u will get the true answer....
and we can know how much Land India lost ,i,e nearly HALF of present india... a
nd if we see in those countries the population of Hindu's is nearly zero and y is that so?Y where hindu's not able to live there?,,,,,,,,,,,,
Religious tolarance was not there in Mughal rule,,, they had tax for non- muslime......
pak ,afghan. and bangladesh was part of india and y is that in Muslime rule in those countries there is almost no Hindu religion?
and if u want to know y Mughal rule ended read

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mughal_Empire

Its decline has been variously explained as caused by wars of succession, agrarian crises fuelling local revolts, the growth of religious intolerance and British colonialism and

..i know u love ur religion but u cant chnage History nor fact's .....

please dont listern to what people have to say , everyone wil talk in favour of there religion and lie,,
read History and history never lies

people who say India was not civilised and pooor, for there information ,India was the most advansed civilisition at that period of time and it was the richest at that time of period and India was the only country in world where u could mine dimonds it had lagest collection of dimonds and gold....that was the reason mughal's invided india.....

read History yaarrrr...
EDIT:::: ############
and if ur a Hindu please read "Mr. capn' edib "'s answer u wil know Hinduisam history..... and it is also History no one can change it,,,,,,
and i hope sincerly that if "Mr. capn ' edib" hate's those Hindu king's who killed buddist and jain people he shd even hate Prophet Muhmmud(P.B.U.H) coz he to distroyed 360 idol's and made war with non-beliver's.. he distroyed all the idols and put Kabha .. and i.e is exactly what Hindu king's did ........ and even Hinduisam vanished form.. pak,. afghan, bangladesh,, and judisum vanished for it's birth place ... who are to be blamed???

By the way ..... if those people did it in some medival period Hindu's are doing it in Modern time's...... Gujrat ,, 1984 roit's....
there is no diffrence between both the communities......
peace....

2007-11-14 11:29:37 · answer #9 · answered by make all possible 1 · 3 2

Muslim invaders ruled India for 800 years and all these years Hindus were majority in India. If they had denigrated, still muslims are only 15% in India. It is like Saddam Hussein ruling Iraq for 35 years. how can a tyrant ruler rule a counrty for such a long time in this age of technology. Same goes to muslim invaders for India. In fact the mughal period is said to be a good age after the Golden Age of India. Still so many temples through out India stands as proof for my answer. Still hindus are majority in India. this is a proof for my answer.

2007-11-14 01:58:24 · answer #10 · answered by meena 6 · 3 6

I kept on ignoring your questions......... but I think you need some history to learn about the facts..

I reproduce few opinions of the great historians and critics about Muslims.


".........I became more than ever convinced that it was NOT THE SWORD that won a place for Islam in those days in the scheme of life. IT WAS THE RIGID SIMPLICITY, the utter self-affacement of the Prophet, the scrupulous regard for pledges, his intense devotion to his friends and followers, his interpidity, his fearlessness, his absolute trust in God and in his own mission. THESE AND NOT THE SWORD carried everything before them and surmounted every obstacle. -- [Mahatma Gandhi in his article published in 'YOUNG INDIA' in 1924]


" It is altogether a misconception that the Arabian progress was due to the 'sword' alone.THE SWORD MAY CHANGE AN ACKNOWLEDGED NATIONAL CREED, BUT IT CAN NOT EFFECT THE CONSCIENCES OF MEN."-- [The Historic Role of Islam, by M.N.Roy,pg-49,Vora & Co.8 Round Building, Bombay-2]


" No other religion in history spread so rapidly as Islam. The West has widely believed that this surge of religion was made possible by the SWORD. But no modern scholar accepts this idea, and the Quran is explicit in the support of the FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE."--James Michener in his article,"Islam: The misunderstood religion", Reader's Digest,May-1955,p-68-70]



And do you know why Budhhism vanished from it's birth place ?...........




During the 7th century a Brahmin King Shashank inflicted severe atrocities on Boddhs. He demolished Boddh Vihar of Buddh Gaya and raised it to the ground. He uprooted & burnt the Bodhi Vrikchha where Buddha is said to have been enlightened.

" Sasanka, the Raja of Bengal, proved in the middle of 7th century A.D. an inveterate enemy of Buddhism and endeavoured a number of times to uproot Bodha tree."--[The Life and Teachings of Buddha - Anagrika Dharmpal]


Another Brahmin King Pushyamitra Shung proved to be more crual towards Buddhism. He destroyed all Bodh Vihars from Patliputra to Jalandhar. He declared a reward of 100 golden Mudras to anyone who killed and showed the beheaded skulls of Buddhists.


" King Pushyamitra who adored and sacrificed to the Devas, destroyed in the 2nd century B.C., many Sanghrahmas and killed the Bhikshus who dwelt therein."--[The Life and Teachings of Buddha - Anagrika Dharmpal]


During 16th century the king of Sinhali iseland, Raja Jai Singh, just to please SHAIVA Sadhus, killed so many Buddhists within 4-5 years that there remained none in his state.


" The Buddhist literature was completely destroyed by the Hindus during Hindu revival headed by Shankracharya."--[The Mahabodhi Journal, Feb-1927]



About Jainism....................



The Jainis also faced severe crualities on the hands of Brahmin Hindus.Another King Pandey Naresh during the middle of 7th century killed 8000 Jainacharyas just on the command of a Shaiva Sadhu Gyansabander.

The Jainis were more victimised in the south. In Chennai one festival called "KULUVETTAL" is celebrated in Tinnvelli district, where a replica of human skull known as the ' head of Samdnal' is kept in the memory of killing of Jainis. Samdnal means a Jain Sadhu in local language. This festival was started by the two Shaiva Sadhus known as Ayyar Tirugyan and Sirutond Nayanar.

These killings are recoreded in "Periya Puranam"


Raja Mahendra Verman also killed thousands of Jainis and destroyed many Jain temples in Patlipur [now Thirupavallupur] and raised Hindu Shaiva temple in its place.


On the commands of Ramanujacharya, Vishnuverdhan, the king of Mysore killed thousands of Jains by crushing them by big stones.



The Sikhs have tatsted your tolerance in 1984.


And what about the poor Muslims ? The killers and butchers are running scot free even after the world witnessed their PROUD CONFESSION over T.V.

The Gujrat carnage came to light but many incidence have remained secret. No body knows how many are yet to be unearthed.


Are you really an ignorant or acting like one ?


Plz tell the world.


..................

2007-11-16 12:01:35 · answer #11 · answered by ♪¢αpη' ε∂ïß♪ ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers