What are the arguments for a god's existence?

Answer 1

Mat 7:6 Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and rend you!

Psa 14:1 The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.

Answer 2

Number 1: What are arguments for non-existence? Why should we have to prove that He does exist if others can't prove that He does not exist.

2: A great philosopher said that to know that G-d exists, man merely needs to look at creation. By looking at the wonders all around us, which people call nature, it's clear that some One made it. Since creation have we ever had anything just happen that's as organized and complex as the universe or life? Man cannot produce such a thing, and nature has no ability on its own to make something new. Sure there is reproduction, but the originals all came from somewhere, and the logical answer (besides belief) brings us back to G-d.

3. If He didn't exist, don't you think after nearly 6,000 years people would have forgotten such a "silly" notion. I doubt that any ridiculous idea of BCE would have such staying power to be debated century after century up until now.

Answer 3

There are arguments for God's existence, but they are not meant so much to convince nonbelievers but rather rationalize the belief for believers. Here are the classical arguments:

Anselm's Ontological Argument: God is that which nothing greater can be thought of. If you can think of something greater, then you were not really thinking about God. Therefore God exists. (It's a circular argument based on the definition of God)

Aquinas' Arguments: 1) There must be a first cause 2) The order of nature is not random

Pascal's Wager: there's a fifty-fifty chance that God exists, what do you lose if you believe in God but God does not exist in the end? Nothing. What do you gain if you believe? Everything.

These are the most famous, but it's still a hot topic in philosophy.

Answer 4

The ones that I have heard do not make much sense, but here they are:

1) Because there is no evidence that he does not exist
2) Because I don't know the answer to something, god must have done it
3) Because the bibe says so, and the bible is the true word of god
4) Because he just exists....no arguments
5) Because so many other people believe him to exist, he must therefore exist. How can so many people be wrong?
6) The universe is so complex, or my eye is so complex. God must exist to have created it.
7) Only fools do not believe in god. So I am not a fool, so god must exist.

Do you get the picture?

Answer 5

Furthering the big bang idea...

In physics-Matter and energy are not created nor destroyed, simply converted, moved, manipulated etc. For there to have been a big bang, there would need to be something to start with. Unless somehow all matter has existed eternally in the past, then it would have been created at some point. This is a direct contradiction in physics, matter cannot be created. Physics=Study of nature. In order for this contradiction to have happened, something supernatural (superior to nature and physics itself) would have had to intervene.

Answer 6

i read the New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures and in it at the back section it stated Satan ruled as a god
that means Satan is a God.
from the bible
God put a 1000 year seal on Satan
to romans an M equals a 1000 year seal.
Thus Satan has a M on Himself.
Since God is Satan
God has a M on Himself
M=IVI sealed together=IIII I sealed together
Thus
God has a IIII I sealed together on Himself.
and thats the twist in CHRISTIANIT,
cause
H=8=2+6=26=7+15+4=G+o+d=God
so
CHRISTIANIT
says
C GOD RIST I A IV I...T(T=liT when read upwards within the T)
so
perhaps eastern religions use this to says CHRISTIANS really worship Satan?
because like romans before them, the babylonians, persions, huns, chinese, all wanted their leaders to rule as God.
but look at the IIII I with the small (almost unnoticable . after the IIII I) and you see the IIII I . is the inspiration for the italians printing of the word DIO.

reading within Islam you see it has the message
I is larri
so perhaps larri with the M is the I, who God is said to be.
and thats why the OT said God is forever known as the I AM.

because

I AM=I AIVI(sealed together)=I AIIII I (sealed together)
I AM=i am
larri (cut &sealed together)=i am

and if God is also said to be the king of the Angels, then
Rev. 9.11
could describe Me also because
Abaddon is really A'b'add'on
where b=DI (sealed together),referring to the fact the D looks like IIII
also since i kind of want to cover up the IIII, i might have a tattoo of a D superimposed on the IIII.
then
ABADDON means ADD A D DON(pronounced DONE) when reading between the lines.
but since i detect the italians hate the fact i exist and they liked it better when the world thought the king of the angels was A'bad'don they probably want Me silenced.
But you can see
God the FATHER reads like FAT IL lER.. (when you read between the lines) or also FAT part HERR cause part-HERR=HER) so both interpretations describe Me. So i guess Germans do have certain bragging rights cause larri is part german.

Answer 7

mathmatics--all numbers eventually reversed in order lead back to a prime "one". Something from nothing is a mathmatical and scientific impossibility--either all has always existed and draws itself out of computations (geometric devisions and multiplication) from prime (known as the mystery of the aleph) or nothing has ever existed. I think since I'm answering this question, we can rule out the second hypothesis.

Answer 8

Well the bible is all screwed up

1.It says "Thou shalt not murder!" Well we have to MURDER the animal to get the meat.
2.People are not honest, they exagerate, and lie, so there is no actual honest true bible,they all are mixed in with lies, and exagerations.
3.How does a ghost impregnate a friggin' woman?Hello?Do you really think that is logical?

Well there are some for you to think about. I am an atheist, and I am 13 years old.Thank you for your time.

Answer 9

A gods existence or Gods' existence. there is a difference. it isnt an argument. truth is truth is truth is truth and stands the test of time- so naturally you should be looking at archeology- particularly biblical archeology. it is what it is. as God said - I am- that I am. he just is. its not debateble or arguable. it only seems that way to those who WANT to debate or argue. but a fact is a fact- truth is truth......and your opinions cannot change that.

Answer 10

God need to proof his existence.Likewise we need to show our identity if someone is in doubt.So why should we arguments for god.Believer must get their own proof.

Answer 11

1. There has to be a supernatural cause for nature; nature can't be its own cause. That is, what caused the Big Bang? The answer has to be supernatural, and that supernatural cause is God.

2. We see evidence of design in nature. Everywhere else we see design we assume the existence of a designer. Nature is no different.

3. Human conscience -- the innate awareness of moral right and wrong.

etc.