The theory of evolution is bogus!!!?

Question

"Scientists discovered “modern men” in Pliocene deposits.
Modern human skulls and bones have been discovered in Pliocene layers. These findings include those at Calaveras (1866), Castenedolo (1860, 1880), and Ipswich (1912).
Finding modern human remains in layers that are believed to be 7-12 million years old casts serious doubt on the theory of evolution regarding humans (or scientific dating methods), since that is the time Ramapithecus (a supposed ape-man) was proposed to exist. If both Ramapithecus and modern man lived at the same time, we would know that people did not evolve from this “ancestor” (or any of the “later” ones). That is, for modern man to evolve from Ramapithecus, Ramapithecus would have had to exist before modern man. The evidence does not support this idea." Please explain to me after this evidence how the theory of evolution holds water.

Here is the link http://www.clarifyingchristianity.com/creation.shtml#pliocene_men.

Answer 1

Everyone knows evolution is a false theory, whether they admit it or not.

Answer 2

I'm not sure how you can look at life on earth and claim that evolution has not occurred. Every form of life on earth has the same kind of DNA and RNA molecules. Clearly we all had a common ancestor, and it wasn't an ape, it was something that was so small it could hardly be called a cell.

In the face of such evidence, you blabbing about skulls found in the wrong layer of earth seems a bit childish. Nothing so trite is going to shake the foundations of the theory of evolution.

Answer 3

I find the answers to your question very ironic. Whereas the facts that you state date modern man at 7 to 12 million years old and no one has caught the fundie discrepancy. Is it possible that here writes a person that is not swayed by either sets of dogma and seeks the truth? and many of you can only doubt and or mock.

Answer 4

I'm sure you'll forgive me if I don't simply take your word for this. A link, a book title, or a refereed journal article would go a long way. Thanks.

Edit: OK. I followed your link. I read the entire blasted page (and, to my credit, didn't scream at my monitor even once) until I finally found the story you cite. They provided a link to a footnote which says the story came from a book called "Ape-Men: Fact or Fallacy", and there the trail ends.

I'm sorry, luv. I'm not going to buy it until I see some kind of reference to an unbiased source. The title of the book, Ape-Men, clearly tells us what the point of the book is.

I do respect that that site seems to be trying to get away from the nonsense that Mr. Gish inaugurated. I wish they'd get away from the ICR, too. But they have a lot to learn about attribution in science.

Answer 5

The big bang theory is probably true. But scientists won't accept the fact that it was God that compressed all that energy into one small atom before it exploded. They have already discovered that matter and energy are interchangeable. Energy began to change into matter (planets and gases) which in turn began to switch back to energy (some into suns) as if energy was spirit. And the cycle continued until one day God turned some of that energy into the soul of Adam. Now when Adam's body dies, his energy as spirit can no longer return to matter, but will continue to live forever. Scientists will some day connect the dots of energy and matter to form the origin of how energy was transformed into spirit to form Adam.

Answer 6

"for modern man to evolve from Ramapithecus, Ramapithecus would have had to exist before modern man"

that is simply untrue, evolution does not require extinction. two or more species or subspecies can coexist indefinately. one or more may or may not go extinct. Evolution is NOT a universal shift in the dna of all the members of a species.

some member of a species can experience an evolutionary pressure, via geographical segregation etc etc etc, whilst the original members can continue to survive without this pressure.

your argument is no better than "why are there still monkeys?"

please dont get your evidence against evolution from people who truly do not even understand it.

Answer 7

Will you just get over it - You are wrong, you keep being proven wrong, and just keep on insisting on being right - have at it.

You insist on believing in a deity with supernatural powers - no matter what facts are presented you insist the facts are wrong What is the point anyway. You care nothing about this planet - you have no respect for it - or mankind in general You prostrate yourself to your church dogma at any cost - right or wrong. Ok, your sky deity created it - He did not do a very good job, so I am embarassed for him/she/it.

Further, if your supreme Deity gave you a brain why do you refuse to use it?

Answer 8

<> it particularly is no longer. <> He did no longer. it particularly is no longer some thing he researched. <> i do no longer understand what 'evolutionists' are meant to be, seeing as i'm no longer attentive to something spoke of as 'evolutionism'. in keeping with threat they're cricketers. <> i do no longer in my view understand. i know it particularly is have been given diddly squat to do with evolutionary concept, some thing that debts for the selection of existence in the international, and is no longer worried in the slightest degree with its origins (if any).

Answer 9

where is the link! arghh! *smile* ^_^

my not knowing everything about evolution, i would say if they are correct and humans coexisted with dinosaurs etc... that doesnt mean that there is a god. it just means that the current model is wrong and needs revision.

hey, i'm not a scientist. just common sense.

Answer 10

You think the Creationist story is even better?