Why can't a woman have more than one husband? Surly 2 incomes would better support a family than one.
2007-11-13 07:54:24 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
One to rub her shoulders and one to rub her feet, duh!
2007-11-13 08:02:34 · update #1
Funny but I think most sane women wouldn't want more than one husband...
2007-11-13 07:57:30 · answer #1 · answered by genaddt 7 · 9⤊ 0⤋
Work and home only really became seperate after the industrial revolution. Until then home was generally also a place of work. The problem is as a result of caring for children and work being seperated what women do in the home has become undervalued and hidden. Women should have the same opportunity to work outside the domestic home as men Women do more in the home than men, perhaps this should be rewarded financially as well. Wages are lower because trade unions had all their power taken away in recent years, more of the older jobs, especially in manufacturing are now gone or have been moved abroad to enable the owners of these companies to make an extra few million in profit by cutting wage costs. Don't blame women, blame capitalism and the greed of share holders.
2016-05-23 00:06:37 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Men seem to get this wrong - it is not a woman's manditory job to stay home. You have a choice. Women in the Bible worked.
Bigomy and Polygamy is a sin. Please see link for more information.
The Bible - New Testament discusses marriage as husband and wife. It does not state these two in plural form.
Want extra income? Invest your money in a plan where interest grows your account. Do not do this through a bank as you will not get full value for your money.
I truly hope this helps.
2007-11-13 08:06:27 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
well in purely scientific terms it lowers the fitness of the two males. If each time the woman is able to have a baby the males only have a 50/50 chance of having paternity why would they stick around when they could get one woman of thier own and have the kid.
2007-11-13 08:20:58 · answer #4 · answered by neilmccalister 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's upto the couple if anyone stays at home. It's what works for their family. IT's not cut and dry. I stay at home b/c I happen to like my kids and love caring for them personally and we take the sacrifice b/c it's only a short while before they are in school full time (6 yrs) and we can handle it. It's not for everyone but it's a personal choice.
2007-11-13 08:01:03 · answer #5 · answered by Yummy♥Mummy 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Women cannot afford to stay at home these days. Not in THIS economy. I WISH I could stay home.
But even with a good salary from my hubby, we still need two incomes to make ends meet and put kids through college.
2007-11-13 08:04:15 · answer #6 · answered by pixie_pagan 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The woman would end up being just a baby machine, one after the other, little sprogs bouncing around everywhere and then there is taking care of them, the home, cooking, laundry etc., etc.
Sorry, the woman would lose out.
2007-11-13 07:59:35 · answer #7 · answered by Pacifica 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
that logic scares me . to think 2 men maybe 6 kids girl, thats suicide and you want to know about two men and a family? it would be 2 men1 wife 2 families the problem would still be there to me you wou increase the head-aches ugh!
2007-11-13 08:03:25 · answer #8 · answered by b.johne k 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They can, if their husband is willing to share. They can not be legally married but they can still have that bond. It is called a Triad or a Polyamorous relationship.
2007-11-13 08:00:29 · answer #9 · answered by jess4u2c2 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I get it, Barry could make sweet love to her on Tuesdays and Thursdays while Frank gets Monday's, Wednesday's and Fridays - but oh wait, the weekends are all hers to bang a prospective third...oooh lah lah.
I don't agree with any of this. It's asinine, all of it.
2007-11-13 07:58:59 · answer #10 · answered by dinky eagle 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋