Are you against it or not.
2007-11-13 07:01:30 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
Totally against it. For many reasons. It's against our privacy. And what happens if you've been to the crime scene for other reasons? DNA stays for a while. If you have a data base with everyone then people who have had touched a table and their DNA is still there. They get pulled in for questioning, there is no reason but just because their DNA is there. The police have no reason to suspect you just because you ate at a cafe a couple days ago. Or you shook hands with a stranger and they end up dead. You were nowhere near the crime scene or even in the state for all you know.
If we put everyone in a database that gives us no protection from the police. They can come barge in your home just because you had contact with a victim.
It should only be used for the criminals who have been convicted, not for the people who have done nothing wrong. It may sound tempting but let's protect our rights. That's what the Constitutions for. Let's not try and get rid of it.
2007-11-14 14:14:34 · answer #1 · answered by pouncival2003 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Criminal Records Search Database : http://SearchVerifyInfos.com/Official
2015-10-08 18:43:02 · answer #2 · answered by Hung 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Violation of private privateness and must be seen as self-incrimination. Planting hair and dermis cells on a similar time as no longer trivial isn't all that confusing to do in the journey that your objective is powerful sufficient. i might % to confirm a invoice that should call for all creditors of DNA to return all such records and swear that each and every person records id has been destroyed and not saved in any media. it would be some distance too hassle-free to get college childrens to donate DNA on some pretext and have the police shop suggested records perpetually, while no crime has been dedicated. i've got faith that each and every citizen is had to understand approximately their government and the persons in it --- the communicate besides the shown fact that isn't real. government could understand no longer something approximately its voters. I foresee in no longer too distant destiny --- human beings to yield biometric records which would be used for balloting. under a Clinton medical plan --- your DNA may well be used to ferret out all people who disagree with the Democrats. by making use of the way The senate invoice S 1693 is up for debate --- a invoice that enables your medical records to be open to truly everyone yet you the project of your records. might you have faith invoice Clinton which incorporate your daughter's medical records? might you have faith Kennedy with any records?
2016-11-11 09:36:00 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Being former military, my DNA is on government file.
Working for Texas Department of Criminal Justice, I deal with criminals 50 hrs a week.
NO. The constitution was written to limit the scope of the goverment to prevent governmental control over every day lives... like was happening in Britain. Anybody who thinks there should be needs to watch Gattaca. It isnt that far fetched.
2007-11-13 07:18:28 · answer #4 · answered by ? 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think everyone should be required to have there DNA put in the database at birth and then every 10-20 years after that... I am totally for that. That's a good Idea
2007-11-13 07:08:14 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
For it in principle.
DNA samples should be taken at birth. This would not only help in criminal cases but also when unidentified corpses are found.
But unfortunately this would not be secure enough and the info could (would !!) fall into the wrong hands and be misused, so is a long way off.
2007-11-13 07:07:39 · answer #6 · answered by hersheba 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Absolutely, every politician and lobbyist past and present. DNA, bar code, and tattoo on forearm. Imagine low long the trial would take if Bush and Cheney got prosecuted? Down here in Florida, they're dropping like flies.
2007-11-13 07:33:18 · answer #7 · answered by Bob H 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well they already have one containing criminals' DNA samples so why not add the rest of the worlds?
It would help when it comes to apprehending suspects in violent and/or sexual crimes. It would also help clear up cases of mistaken identity and free people who are in jail who are innocent. We would be able to put away those who are actually responsible.
I don't think it should be used for petty crimes though. Prisons are already overcrowded as it is.
2007-11-13 07:09:05 · answer #8 · answered by Kat 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No. Those that are on DNA databases already are being mistakenly re-arrested for other crimes due to errors in testing.
2007-11-13 07:06:21 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Should we allow the police to break through your door at any hour with or without a warrant?
Uhm NO.
2007-11-13 07:07:15 · answer #10 · answered by Alan C 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋