2007-11-13 06:36:42 · 13 answers · asked by Crystal 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
paintings only dear
2007-11-13 06:39:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
No pictures of Jesus are possible because the camera was not invented yet. Any you see of Jesus with long hair are made up of how the artist would have like him to be.
2007-11-13 14:41:17 · answer #2 · answered by geessewereabove 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I got THE first pic of Jesus:
http://poetry.rotten.com/jesus-with-boy/jesus-with-boy.jpg
AND the second:
http://www.disinterestedparty.com/mt-static/images/femalejesus.jpg
2007-11-13 14:46:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
There are no pictures of Jesus, only artists impressions of what he may have looked like. He would most likely have had a beard and dark hair, but that's all anyone has to go on.
2007-11-13 14:45:00 · answer #4 · answered by Trevor S 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The Shroud of Turin is not a reliable source and does in no way depict the face of Christ.
2007-11-13 14:51:15 · answer #5 · answered by Sophie 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's a Wonderful Life.
2007-11-13 14:43:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
If it was the shroud it is dated arround 1500 from the pigment types used to create it.
2007-11-13 14:42:29 · answer #7 · answered by Terry M 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
So you only believe in things that have happened since the invention of the camera?
2007-11-13 14:42:08 · answer #8 · answered by doug 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
There is no known portraits of Jesus because Roman law forbid painting of Jews.
2007-11-13 14:43:19 · answer #9 · answered by preacher 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋
The Shourd of Turin
2007-11-13 14:39:52 · answer #10 · answered by Royal Racer Hell=Grave © 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
isn't it amazing that the bible said that Jesus' grave clothes were 2 pieces and the shroud is one piece?
which is right?
2007-11-13 14:44:01 · answer #11 · answered by jesussaves 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋