they cant proof either that there is no great flying spaghetti which is supernatural and therefore we cant se hear or feel it.
if the great flying spaghetti is somehow supernatural, its the best excuse not to be asked to proof it.
2007-11-13
04:47:55
·
14 answers
·
asked by
Smoking Frog
2
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
btw: the evolution theroy has already been proofed
2007-11-13
04:49:18 ·
update #1
and even the pope accepted it
2007-11-13
04:50:21 ·
update #2
and even the pope accepted it
2007-11-13
04:50:23 ·
update #3
when your argument is backed by zero facts & is illogical, this is your only recourse.
2007-11-13 04:52:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
I think it's a little more complicated than any of these answers. When people on either side ask for 'proof' what they're really saying is 'Show me a good reason not to think the way I do.' Of course asking for 'proof' is a clumsy way to put the question because there's no proof either way, and -proof- is not the reason we think the way we do, either believing or not believing. So you know when you ask that question that you're asking for something impossible.
If you really wanted to know how the other person felt, you'd ask 'Why do -you- think the way you do'?
(Some) Christians and (some) Atheists today feel embattled. The feel victimized by the other side. Each feels the other side has gone past its bounds, has unfairly gained the upper hand. And the purpose dumb questions like this is not to better understand the other side, try to persuade or even reason with them, it is just to put them in their place, to make their position, whichever it is, sound unreasonable.
2007-11-13 05:03:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think of what's being asked for is that if there is any information that contradicts any specific theory approximately God. Atheists believe that Jesus replaced into in no way resurrected from the ineffective and if all of us ever got here upon the remains of Jesus then that should coach that Jesus wasn't God. As for proofs with regard to the existence of God ordinarily, one can not particularly practice that there is no longer a God as He exists exterior of the universe and is no longer constrained by using the regulations of the universe. in case you have been locked in a room on your total existence and had to coach the non-existence of something exterior the room, you should no longer particularly. yet whilst the element exterior of the room had made the room, you should get some awareness of the element exterior the room by using the 'signature' of ways the room is built. Others attempt to disprove the existence of God or specific factors of God by using using logical proofs. some might say that if morality is given by using God then it might must be arbitrary or it might ought to take transport of to God by using something else and hence God replaced into created by using something else and hence no longer God. This throws maximum folk off yet what they ought to understand is that immoral acts are those that are committed against God's nature and not arbitrary. nonetheless some instructions of God are greater or much less arbitrary, such because of the fact the instructions against eating shellfish that have been greater or much less given to guard people who did no longer have refrigeration and present day sanitation.
2016-10-16 09:16:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If the evolution theory has been proven, do you have the scientific data documenting this? Your statement would have to mean that science has definitively proved that life started by an evolutionary process. Do you have this?
The pope, as I understand, was simply explaining that if evolution was the material, physical process by which life developed, it still does not take away from the fact that we have a soul and are ultimately spiritual beings.
2007-11-13 05:25:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by Danny H 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
1.) As a christian i ask you for no proof of the non-existance of God.
2.) As for "even the pope accepted it" the pope is just a man just like me.
3.)As for "btw: the evolution theroy has already been proofed" just go read "Refuting Evolution" You can read it for free at:http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/re1/index.asp
I am not asking you to buy in to it I am just asking you to read so that you can see some of the things about evolution may not be true.
2007-11-13 04:58:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by MadDog 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
mmm, interesting. On that basis then we should insist that cristians provide the proof that the Flying Spaghetti Monster does not exist.
Get to work xtians - Jesus commands you, to prove to me that FSM is not real.
RaMen
2007-11-13 05:07:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
It's because they know they have no proof of god's existence and they think this is a clever comeback. No matter how many times you try to tell them that you cannot--and do not need to--prove a negative, they just don't get it, mostly because they don't want to.
2007-11-13 04:51:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
1⤋
evolution has not been proven, it is only a scapegoat to do what they really want to do - live worthless. it's just a myth, a boondoggle,a sham, a flimflam. Only God is real, a pure fact and atheists only get mad because they know they can't prove that God doesn't exist.Wakeup.
2007-11-13 04:58:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Because they don't understand how scientific process works.
If they did, a good number of them probably wouldn't be Christians anymore.
"Atheists ask us to prove God exists, we ask them to prove God doesn't exist since they are asserting God does not exist. I think that's fair."
This is exactly what I'm referring to - this demonstrates a lack of understanding of scientific process.
2007-11-13 04:51:40
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
8⤊
1⤋
That's a terrible assumption that anything can be "super" natural... If it exists isn't it all natural?
_()_
2007-11-13 04:51:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by vinslave 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Lame rebuttal
2007-11-13 04:51:13
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
3⤋