2007-11-13 01:01:33 · 18 answers · asked by Let's Debate 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Lol, everyone's scared.
2007-11-13 01:17:40 · update #1
No thanks sonny, if you can't do it here, you can't do it.
2007-11-13 01:06:59 · answer #1 · answered by timbers 5 · 8⤊ 0⤋
I admire your willingness to challenge atheists. They need to be challenged. Let me give you some helpful advice. When asking a question to an atheist give lots of details. List them, and don't live anything out. If you don't they will make up an excuse that because you didn't tell them what color shoes someone was wearing, they can't answer the question. Never quote the bible. You can use the bible as a reference, but sorta state it as if it isn't from the bible. Plus ask them questions on morality and compassion. YES atheists HAVE MORALITY, but they get confused in tough situations. Use one my questions as an example.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20071112012737AAVbCSp&r=w
is a good one.
Edit:
Ask them why they think they "own science". Since through out history most early scientist (philosophers) believed in a some idea of a diety. That would include Newton.
2007-11-13 09:21:01 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
i would not mind, but since i know that in the end it will come down to you asking "so then how did we all get here"
we all do not know 100%
and if you say the bible told you so,
then well, you should be more open to other things and not just believe everything that is written on a piece of paper.
there is no 100% proof that a god exists.
2007-11-13 09:23:41 · answer #3 · answered by Ann(ie) 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Sorry, the last email debate I got into ended with the other person basically saying, "If you don't agree with my point of view, you're completely illogical."
I'm not into more lame-a** conversion attempts.
2007-11-13 09:05:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 0⤋
I've had a few of those. The biblethumpers can't prove that God exists, so nothing else they have to say has any validity. It ends up being a waste of time.
2007-11-13 09:13:02 · answer #5 · answered by S K 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
What's the problem with you debating in the open (online forum or in public) in front of witnesses?
2007-11-13 09:09:48 · answer #6 · answered by Maureen B 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I would be happy to if you can be rational... from the looks of your Q&A's I've seen, it may be a challenge for you.
Just write when you are ready.
EDIT
3 days, still waiting.
2007-11-13 18:35:23 · answer #7 · answered by skeptic 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Underneath it all you are feeling insecure, and want to try to boost your ego by telling us what you think, whilst refusing to listen with any serious intent to what we say ... so what is the point?
EDIT:
Yes, child, we're all scared of you. Keep telling yourself that.
.
2007-11-13 09:07:27 · answer #8 · answered by ABB 6 · 5⤊ 0⤋
I'm up for it -- on the condition that you don't object to any e-mails being posted on a blog. Fire away.
(** EDIT **) Come on, then!
2007-11-13 13:13:34 · answer #9 · answered by sparky_dy 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I've already e-mailed you several times and got no reply. You have no answer to our science because you simply don't understand it.
2007-11-13 10:23:25 · answer #10 · answered by penster_x 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
How many times do you have to loose before you give up?
2007-11-13 09:44:33 · answer #11 · answered by ɹɐǝɟsuɐs Blessed Cheese Maker 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋