No more possible than it is for science to prove that He does exist. It is not the purpose of science to do so.
2007-11-13 00:43:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by A-chan 4
·
4⤊
0⤋
Science doesn't need to prove it. We exist do we not? The Universe exsists does it not? Also, have the scientists proven how the 'BIG BANG' came about, because that would be really enlightening, since they seem to have to prove that everything has to have a logical answer. As for evolution, thats a load of crap. Think about what it is, if evolution were true, wouldn't we all be still developing into some other odd creature? I believe God exists, and I didn't need science to figure it out.
2016-05-22 22:47:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
True and Objective Science actually finds GOD at every turn.
Evolution is a theory-hence it has not been proven. It goes all on the basis of IF this happened THEN this and that followed. They are still trying to figure it out dude.
Whenever that "scientist" shows up and does that? disprove the exsistence of The Originator? then I will be one of the first to trash my belief system.
I have the confidence that will not happen because of the many proofs that show God IS.
May He lead you into His Truth!
2007-11-13 00:57:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by xgarmstrong 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is not possible. Science has its limits to what it can do, as does religion. Intuition give us a sense of our spirit and the spiritual realm. The spiritual realm is made up of the type of energy, that is beyond science's ability to measure. But people with highly developed spiritual senses know to a degree about this area. Psychics will continue to be useful to police forces. And, tuned in spiritual leaders will still inspire the human soul. The spiritual and God, the universal spirit, will still continue untouched by science.
2007-11-13 00:47:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by astrogoodwin 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think the problem stems from that science and religion can't prove their point either way.
Science can say that rain is created by the water cycle. Religion can say that their God created the water cycle to create rain.
You can't prove or disprove the theory of a god because it's based on faith. What faith creates isn't something you can test in a labatory.
2007-11-13 00:45:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
The answer is very simply no, because:
1. Science can only prove something that is observable.
2. Logic says you cannot prove a negative.
2007-11-13 00:54:10
·
answer #6
·
answered by Ed H 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
What science "says" is that there is not a single shred of evidence for the existence of God, and there is no single phenomenon that requires the existence or action of God.
Science "does not bother" to prove the in-existence of god, since there is no scientific value to study this issue.
2007-11-13 00:43:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Technically, no -- but it CAN prove that God's spontaneous existence is a very very unlikely thing -- several orders of magnitude more unlikely than the abiogenesis that theists say could only have occurred through God's help.
2007-11-13 00:49:38
·
answer #8
·
answered by The Reverend Soleil 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Science has nothing to do with the creator of Monkeys. I would say God had a hand in that.
Just as he had created the Heavens and Earth. ect......without all of that you wouldn't have the MONKEY. : )
I will pray for you.
2007-11-13 00:48:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by cocoamoe 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
NO.
(Romans 1:20) For his invisible [qualities] are clearly seen from the world’s creation onward, because they are perceived by the things made, even his eternal power and Godship, so that they are inexcusable;
2007-11-13 00:54:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by pugjw9896 7
·
0⤊
0⤋