2007-11-12 22:34:10 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Yes I think the Republican party should be disbanded for the torture alone.
2007-11-13 00:44:25 · update #1
the rest of the world is asking the same thing!
2007-11-12 22:38:05 · answer #1 · answered by xxhale69 2 · 3⤊ 10⤋
Just not Republicans. You know as well as every person there the Democrats voted to go to war, The problems came when the troops in the field were stabbed in the back by the far left. This gave the enemy hope and help and hurt any thing the US was doing. So if any person loves a endless war it would be the dems because they have made this war last much to long By loving the terrorist.
2007-11-12 23:35:32 · answer #2 · answered by jmack 5 · 8⤊ 3⤋
They don't .
What republican endless wars are those ??
I know about democratic party endless wars:
WW l
WW ll
Korean War
Vietnam War
Not to mention all the smaller wars the democrats got us involved in, in places like:
Niagara, Haiti, Bosnia, kosavo.
And lets not even mention the last democratic prersident who attacked/invaded six different countries on four separate continents,
All without Congressional or UN approval.
2007-11-13 00:17:53 · answer #3 · answered by jeeper_peeper321 7 · 5⤊ 2⤋
Considering how the democrats want to end the war immediately and remove the troops before the end of the year... And when asked when she would remove the troops from Iraq, Hillary Clinton said by the year 2013...
I'm unclear as to specifically what you are deeming "endless war" from the standpoint of contesting it's the republicans who don't want this war to end.
2007-11-12 23:01:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
hey look,after 911, i guess we need to be thankfull, that a declaration of articles of war were not passed, the un closed, america pulled out of the geneva convention,a full draft with no exclusions and the entire nation mobilized.just think, you could have been drafted if franklin d. roosevelt's ghost in the whitehouse prevailed?
2007-11-13 13:48:50 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Politicians in general feel they deserve to do whatever they want by virtue of a majority of votes cast. As long as they continue to receive such a majority their belief if justified. This has nothing to do with party, they're all pretty much the same.
2007-11-13 04:18:49 · answer #6 · answered by rich k 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
You are right. Most of the US people are not deserving of the sacrifice our service men and women make on their behalf. The US people are lazy, ungrateful, whinny, selfish, and narcissistic with attentions spans barely longer than a Sienfeld episode.. They allow petty political hatred blind them to the real dangers in the world. They have become a 5 star Gimme generation. They can't stand seeing a dime spent unless it is on them.
Bring our troops home now. We need the money for more welfare. There are millions of single women out there who don't have time to work. Taking care of babies is a full time job.
I'm sure if we ignore the problem, it will just go away.
Some part of me hopes a Democrat is elected. Then you will either have a Jimmy Carter, guaranteeing another 25-50 years of problems with Islam, or, you will thrash in frustration as your President looks at Islamic Extremism and says, "Republicans are right, these people are crazier than a bunch of sh*t house rats and need to be dealt with finally and decisively."
As for Republicans and War: Check your history. WWI, WWII, Vietnam, all DEMOCRAT Presidents. In Korea we were basically mandated by UN agreement to defend S. Korea.
Speaking of endless wars, when is the War on Drugs going to be over? Since we all call it "The War on Drugs", does that make all people in prison on drug convictions prisoners of war? Have we not spent enough on it? Why after over 40 years have we not won?
Blah blah blah blah blah
I believe history will show you Liberals to be wrong on everything from education, healthcare, and energy to Islam and Man Caused (OMG we're all gonna die) Global Warming.
2007-11-12 23:38:39 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 3⤋
I'll tell ya why. Because this insane world drew us out of our isolation in 1917, then again in 1941 and we had to stick around for the cold war. Now we have the remnants of the communists and these muslim nutbuckets to deal with. It's time to fix this insane world once and for all. That's why!
2007-11-13 12:55:03 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Why don't you ask the people of third world countries the same? Instead of declaring war on the US they could better spend that money feeding their own people. As has been proven in recent days, if the Muslims can't kill American's or the people of Israel, they will turn and kill each other.
2007-11-12 23:13:35 · answer #9 · answered by 2nd AD/ 4th ID 5 · 9⤊ 2⤋
I think that the countries of big superiority have a 'duty of care' to other countries when they are in need of aid... Saddam had massacred thousands and thousands of his own people... It was ruining the country and the people living in it... If you actually talk to the people in Iraq. MOST support us being there and are extremely grateful. I've seen first hand what a dictatorship can do to a country and it really is grotesque. (Romania, Chowchesku) Orphans starving themselves to death...... Down syndrome kids begin on the street because of a lack of support... Like I said, 'duty of care'.
2007-11-12 23:34:12 · answer #10 · answered by iceydicer 2 · 5⤊ 3⤋
You have a real ****-on for Republicans and war don't you?
Which party was in power when WWl started....Wilson a Democrat. And WWll...Roosevelt, yep another Democrat. And let's not forget that little war in Vietnam shall we.....right again, JFK another Democrat.
OK, you got me on Korea....Eisenhower was a Republican.
But that's Democrats 3 and Republicans 1 waging endless war; historically speaking.
2007-11-12 23:32:21 · answer #11 · answered by iraq51 7 · 8⤊ 5⤋