both using similar vocabular as before they attact Iraq (mass destruction weapons and terrorregime). Are we getting closer to WW 3? Democracy with the sword? sounds like 1000 years ago when we tried to free Jerusalem from the muslims, we called mass murder Crusade than.
2007-11-12 22:32:52 · 14 answers · asked by Bernd 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
@I change my icon every week and it got nothing to do with my political interests.
2007-11-13 00:47:51 · update #1
@of cause we were Crusaders,it doesn't matter if you are american those people were your ancestors.
2007-11-13 00:54:33 · update #2
Sleazy Dick probably is but wannabe King George hasn't got the brains to plan his next bowel movement.
2007-11-12 23:24:29 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Who the hell is WE? I don't recall any US citizens battling in the crusades? Can you name even one American that fought in the Crusades? NO....since there wasn't a USA during the time of the Crusades.
If you're going to try and use historical references to push your inaccurate assessment of a pending WWlll during this administration try and be historically accurate. Your inaccurate misuse of history offends those of us who actually know some history.
EDIT
Man you do lack any historical perspective. Being an American is a nationality not ancestral.
2007-11-12 23:39:04 · answer #2 · answered by iraq51 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
It sounds extraordinary to you that George Bush and Dick Cheney did no longer grab administration of the country and the government by using militia skill, yet your theory that they, on your recommendations, destroyed the country and made a mockery of the form isn't extraordinary? actuality is a superb element. you may believe despite the fact which you opt for to yet actuality has a manner of bringing forth information and actuality. Hatred for somebody you disagree with, will quite much continuously cloud one's skill to confirm actuality. luckily for us and the international, history is the arbiter of actuality and contains no hatred that can blind the observer. your own hatred of those adult males is your legacy and your history. Their legacy and their history would be around some years after your hatred and intentional distortion of actuality and information have died.
2016-10-16 08:35:54 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes.we started an unjust war in the middle east, we tried to start something with north korea last year, and tried to piss off china, now iran. if we can just hold off the warmongers(bush/cheney)for 1 year 1 month, and a couple weeks....maybe we can go back to fighting for peace. no matter whos elected.
2007-11-13 01:01:07 · answer #4 · answered by smarternow 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I don't recall the US being involved in the crusades. By the way, isn't that dirt bag you have a pic of dead? That's sad isn't it?
2007-11-13 01:56:44 · answer #5 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO they are just concerned, I mean honestly.... Muslims extremists with Nukes? Wouldn't ANY good president be concerned?? Wake up people!
2007-11-12 23:51:39 · answer #6 · answered by iceydicer 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Bush couldn't plan a ham sandwich. All the disasters of the past 7 years have been the result of a lack a planning, not sinister planning.
2007-11-12 22:51:28 · answer #7 · answered by foru0810 3 · 1⤊ 4⤋
all they seems to be doing is provoking attack. if you keep telling someone they are planning war, they will eventually plan it. similar to any situation. if you keep trying to annoy someone, they will get annoyed.
bush doesnt have a bloomin clue most of the time, it would be interesting to see bush without daddy for a day or so. He would cause utter chaos.
2007-11-12 22:42:01 · answer #8 · answered by putonyourmittens 2 · 1⤊ 4⤋
No, I don't think they're up to a world war. Just sabre rattling if you ask me.
2007-11-12 22:37:34 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Al Q declared it to be WWIII long before Bush ever took office. Thanks for the two points.
2007-11-12 23:38:58 · answer #10 · answered by 2nd AD/ 4th ID 5 · 4⤊ 1⤋