Anyone else see the irony in splitting up the phrase "one nation indivisible"?

Question

Guess not.

Answer 1

You're asking a roomfcul of people who believe in an imaginary being to know what "irony" is? Please. The phrase you use is hysterical, considering we've already been to war with each other, and been REALLY blessed divided. And we are divided still. We are not a unified nation, which is what makes us great, if people could see beyond their differences and embrace the reality, and the diverseness tha mkes each of us wonderful and special.

Answer 2

huh? what 'irony'? "indivisible" ability without ability to divide. joined with the word, 'one united states' emphasizes the flexibility & cohesion that's no longer in basic terms implied yet brazenly meant. a civil conflict interior the 1860s replaced into all approximately this cohesion, indivisibility, this u . s .. what could be 'irony' may be the 50 states continuously threatening to drag away, continuously combating among themselves , in no way seeing 'the vast image'. united statesa. could, then, be stated as the DISunited states yet then we at the instant are not! dispite what maximum persons (translate that to outsiders) think of, united statesa. & human beings have fun transformations, like to devour & drink different cultures' fares, et cetera. the form nicely bridges the states' rights over the feds. something no longer stated interior the form is given to the states to be sure. the association won't be able to be all undesirable in lots as our shape & style of government is the main copied in historic past EVER!