2007-11-11 10:15:03 · 10 answers · asked by Adham 1910 4 in Family & Relationships ➔ Singles & Dating
Who said so?!!!
Never ya Adham, will you believe me if I tell you that I live in romance all my life, all the past of it and insha'llah all the future, romance is not monopolized by lovers, moreover, I BELIEVE that unless we become more romantic, life will stay as dull and tough as it is now, why don't we love each other? I challenge anyone who claims that being romantic has a single disadvantage, can you tell me one?
2007-11-12 07:52:42 · answer #1 · answered by Green visitor is back :D 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
That's an interesting question. I think romance is for lovers to experience, but others can feel it. They can watch on and understand the lovers' feelings, but they can't experience romance without having someone to share it with.
2007-11-11 10:18:10 · answer #2 · answered by Jamie 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no
there are different kinds of romances
even some between friends
2007-11-11 10:18:06 · answer #3 · answered by Christianna 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
for some people, you don't have to be husband and wife to have romance......... and you don't have to be husband and wife to be lovers.......... therefore, romance can NOT be for lovers only
2007-11-11 10:21:30 · answer #4 · answered by whitesilk 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no of course not --- romance is for everyone --- we need more romance in the world
2007-11-11 10:18:28 · answer #5 · answered by Waterdragon 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no it is not
someone told me that there is romance between friends too
but it differs too much
2007-11-12 07:15:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course not!
2007-11-11 10:18:05 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
you have to be married
2007-11-11 10:17:43 · answer #8 · answered by Bob B 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
its for everbody.
2007-11-11 10:18:10 · answer #9 · answered by Jerry S 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No dummy, it is what leads to being lovers! Duh!
2007-11-11 10:19:46 · answer #10 · answered by It All Matters.~☺♥ 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋