English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

29 answers

I vote for compulsory execution of all those over 60! Make some space! Hahahahaha!


Go on! Give me a thumbs down why don't you!!!

2007-11-11 07:04:15 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 11

Well it might be a good idea in principle but the problem is that demographics mean that in 10 years time 50% of the populace will be over 65.

We do not have the younger people to do the jobs so in order to cover them we allow increased immigration, which is exactly what the Government are currently doing.

Unfortunately in the future this will mean higher income tax to cover commitments to state pension/pension guarantee rates or lower pensions/benefit rates.

It is likely the benefit rates will drop which is why everyone has been encouraged to put by for retirement since the 1980's.

Some pension schemes are run well and others are not which means that private incomes will vary widely in the future.

Sadly the consequence of this means that we will all be working longer and may not retire at all in the future.

2007-11-11 07:23:12 · answer #2 · answered by Dee L 5 · 0 0

This question is disturbing on so many levels. It's as if you want to find someone to blame for the difficulty of finding a good job. There's nothing new about blaming another group of people for the difficulty of daily life. Most people tend to blame ethnic populations, religious groups, gays, foreigners, or some other seemingly random group of choice. Perhaps I should be relieved that you've pointed the finger at those over 60. But I'm not. It's pathetic really.

There was a movie called Logan's Run that deals with this issue. It's an old one but might be worth a look.

2007-11-11 07:20:54 · answer #3 · answered by ekimdiaz 2 · 0 0

And which jobs are you looking to take? In my profession (medical technologist) there are very few young people coming in to the field. When the rest of us are ready to retire, who's going to do the work? Nursing is another profession where there is a shortage of help of any age. Nothing is preventing a young person from being there either. When Social Security was first devised, the average life span was shorter and there was a large base of people paying in to the system. Now, there is a smaller base of people paying in and more people living longer taking out. If retirement starts sooner, the system will go bankrupt that much faster.
Are you willing to have your grandparents move in with you because they can't afford to live independently any longer? Maybe you'd like it if we just shoot old people.

2007-11-11 07:17:25 · answer #4 · answered by hwinnum 7 · 0 0

Exactly what jobs are the 60 year olds taking from the 25 year olds? It's a confused question. Besides, the young are better off with the elders being at work otherwise they will end up paying increased taxes as there will be more people claiming state pensions.

2007-11-11 07:11:48 · answer #5 · answered by bear 1 · 1 0

No, It wouldn't be better.
It depends on the country, but if we look to western countries then we might see that most of these countries will fase huge aging problems in the next decades; people get older, while couples get less children.

That means that within 50 years the retired people will almost equal the amount of workers, who have to keep the country running.
If people retire on their 60th birthday, there will be not enough people to meet the needs of society. In other words; there will be more jobs than people who can work.

2007-11-11 07:19:50 · answer #6 · answered by Mido 1 · 0 0

Yes, I agree. But only if the person wants to retire. Some people want to keep on working. But you do realize that younger workers are the ones who pay into social security for the ones now retired, right? It isn't your own personal money for retirement.

2007-11-11 07:06:38 · answer #7 · answered by Squirrley Temple 7 · 0 0

you will desire to locate a niche contained domestically and attempt to fill it. I stay close to Boston, MA. there's a brilliant community of tech workers yet a extreme scarcity experienced hard work. I took a night course on the close by vocational college in device technologies/machinest. It became 8 weeks. the section is so desperate for experienced workers that my instructor got here upon me a activity even till now i became complete! the business company is now training at $15.00 an hour. i'm fifty 5. to locate those jobs, call each and every employment organization on your section. Ask them the place the hard work shortages are. contain state employment administrations as properly. sturdy success!

2016-12-16 05:26:01 · answer #8 · answered by melaine 4 · 0 0

Why, do younger people want to work in B and Q then ? A lot of older people want to carry on working after 65 and some up to 70. Surely if they enjoy keeping healthy and mixing with people why shouldn't they ( or we one day ) carry on working. Who are we to say they have to stop as some cannot afford to anyway

2007-11-11 07:06:47 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

I'd like to retire at 60 but as a charity worker on low income and no private pension I doubt if I could afford to.

2007-11-11 07:10:29 · answer #10 · answered by Storm Rider 4 · 2 0

Old people aren't jobs from younger people. However, I read in a magazine that people who retire after 55, have a higher risk of dying in the next 6 months.

2007-11-11 07:09:55 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers