Doesn't everything depend on something dying.
Isn't it in out nature to be brutal animals?
Shouldn't we let our animalistic tendencies out?
Shouldn't the beast be allowed to roam free, the chains released and the claws unsheathed?
What do you think?
2007-11-11 06:08:14 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Tell ya what. Take three young toddlers and place them together with two toys.
You will quickly and unquestionably discover your answer along with other dynamics of basic human nature.
The answer might make you "cry like a baby."
2007-11-11 06:13:55 · answer #1 · answered by Randy 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The human race has been there done that already and traces of it still is evident and very much apart of society today think Lead paint toys, unsafe death traps, unsafe drugs and other products and services the unwitted general public mindlessly believe to be safe and regulated.(just to name a few casualities of true capitalism, Bush's anti - terrorist war, more money spent on war than education and health care & concerns combined for a decade. I think it is time the beast was caged and tamed other wise we are just all doomed to set in coffins and have no true winners.
2007-11-11 14:28:57 · answer #2 · answered by calmlikeatimebomb 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The obvious answer is that the beast does roam free. As our population grew we developed ways to keep killing ourselves of from unbridled competition.
People study this as part of politics:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agonism
Co-operation is a highly successful survival strategy. The rugged individualism idealized by capitalism is not.
2007-11-11 14:22:45 · answer #3 · answered by Y!A-FOOL 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
THIS is a horrible thought because if we all did what you just said "let the beast out" eventually the whole mankind will be wiped out and will be no more humans left!thats stuff that i use to think about when i was 10 but i grew out of the ignorance and so should you
2007-11-11 14:37:13 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
The one thing that seperates man from animal, we are civil. Feelings come into play for us. I see nothing wrong with killing animals for food though. But i don't think we should be allowed to just be brutal to animals or eachother for no reason.
2007-11-11 14:15:22 · answer #5 · answered by Emily 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that killing is in our nature.And everyone knows it. Thats why since tthe beginning there have been laws telling us not to kill. If there was no consequence for killing then our species would be on the verge of extinction. Why do you think people love hunting so much. There not killing animals when they hunt out of neccessity they are doing to satisfy a primal need to kill.
2007-11-11 14:21:03 · answer #6 · answered by upside 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If it is, I must not be of the human nature.
Aint kilt no body as of yet and I am pretty much near the end of my journey.
had a recall of a past life, vivid, where I killed someone, and let me tell you, if you ever want to feel like the devil..... well.
2007-11-11 14:21:51 · answer #7 · answered by bigger_than_bear 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What do I think? I think you need to give visits to the zoo and the horror movies you've obviously been watching a rest.That, or up the dosage of whatever medication you're on.
2007-11-11 14:15:09 · answer #8 · answered by Wired 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
killing isnt in our nature, we werent born with a gun and a hitlist.
1.not everything( actually not much besides meat)
2,no, we evolved
3.not if it involves killing a helpless something or other( get a punching bag!)
4.we arent beast, though....once again, evolution
2007-11-11 14:13:26 · answer #9 · answered by answerneeder 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Is killing fish for dinner or a buffalo for dinner in our nature?
Yes, it seems to me.
2007-11-11 14:17:12 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋