Well like any other FICTION film editor, I take him as he should be taken. With the knowledge that he is creating a work of FICTION.
2007-11-11 05:18:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by USMCstingray 7
·
8⤊
1⤋
He's an idiot who uses half truths to promote his views and to wrongfully and knowingly deceive the uneducated portion of the masses over to his side. As a Michigan resident, being caught up in the rapid decline of the US auto industry (one subject done by Moore) and as a Veteran (another subject done by Moore) I can tell you the reality is far different than Mr. Moores fantasy world of right wing conspiracies. He makes all his money off VICTIMS and the publics sympathy for them. He's an admitted and proven liar, a false-journalistic piece of scum.
2007-11-12 01:23:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by Phonebreaker 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
Not at all. I'm no fan of the Bush admin, but the guy is propaganda artist who does more harm than good by splicing together misleading video clips, using straw man attacks, etc. Then he backs it up with "research" which amounts to more blantant abuses of the truth.
2007-11-11 05:07:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by Daniel 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
No, I can't stand him. His documentaries have more holes than a wheel of Swiss cheese. He is also a grand master of distortion when it comes to his interviews. He will take an interview and apply it to a different time period to emphasize a point that wasn't the intention of the interviewee. The greatest irony of all is his latest leftist propaganda Sicko. Everyone knows obesity is one of the greatest risks to our health. So if Michael Moore had his way with the goal of socialized medicine, I'd have to foot the bill for his fat ***. I would strongly recommend watching FahrenHYPE 9/11, which actually made an effort to get the facts correct.
For the record, I'm no fan of Bush nor Fox News. You want to criticize either one, great. Perhaps someone with more integrity would be better suited for the job.
2007-11-11 05:17:16
·
answer #4
·
answered by Rckets 7
·
11⤊
3⤋
Yeah....he was great in that movie where he was the rich guy and Bo Derek was nekkid. Oh wait....that was Dudley Moore. Michael Moore is a blithering buffoon.
2007-11-11 17:18:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
have you ever seen his documentaries, i think of for sure no longer. He telling actuality with examples and proofs. Why dont you compromise with him. lots of the worldwide places even arising worldwide places, training upto commencement is loose. Whats your situation. You human beings have rights, why dont you wanna combat for that. do you be attentive to how plenty funds US spending in India for our training( no longer purely US, international economic corporation Too). yet i become shocked as quickly as I observed training and scientific therapy isn't loose on your united states. US is spending funds for our training yet no longer for yours. In our united states loose training and wellness care is our precise. Now think of who's fooling you ( you could think of its me)
2016-11-11 03:41:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by Erika 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes - his humor adds a whole different dynamic to the humdrum genre of documentary filmmaking. And he certainly created a different genre altogether there. Some might also see him as a radical, irresponsible left-wing journalist. But I can tell you that there are an equally, irresponsible handful of right-wing news organizations who should have their journalistic licenses revoked for disseminating the propaganda they do on this so-called "war on terror".
2007-11-11 04:46:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
2⤋
He makes a lot of interesting points, but does anyone really love him???
2007-11-11 04:45:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by Jim! 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, but I love Dinty Moore.
2007-11-11 04:50:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by Chapter and Verse 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
I don't like him at all. He capitalizes too often on the weaknesses of himself and others just to make a buck. He has no imagination.
2007-11-11 05:52:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by tercentenary98 6
·
5⤊
1⤋