HIV Question?

Question

I received oral about 2 years with 2 different people. Since than about 1 year after this happened. I went and received an hiv rapid test. The test that takes a sample from your gums. Than gives you a result in 15-20 minutes. Test came back negative. I also had a test that I did at home. Where I took a blood sample and put it into a solution. That came back negative. I've been to two doctors who said my "possible" exposure. Is nothing to worry about. Because the risk is so low. I just had a complete blood work. And my white and red blood cells came back normal. Should I still be concerned?

Answer 1

RELAX. I have a best friend that is an AIDS nurse. The test you had done (putting the stick inside your mouth on your cheek/gums) is 99.99% accurate. And after having the blood tests come back negative also, I'm quite sure you are okay. Just be thankful and don't involve yourself in any more risky behavior. Be kind to yourself.

Answer 2

You should be more careful in the future. Use a dental dam. They're weird but what is worse, a dental dam or death? If you're really concerned have a doctor do both the ELISA test (the first blood test for HIV) AND the Western Blot test (which is usually not done unless the ELISA comes back positive. However, I wouldn't worry.

Answer 3

no one has yet chanced on the starting place of HIV. The best hypothesis (the superb time I checked) changed into that SIV (simian immunodeficiency virus) by some skill mutated and crossed from primates (likely chimpanzees) into people (growing HIV, or the human immunodeficiency virus). it is only a hypothesis, in spite of the indisputable fact that it variety of feels to be the most supported one. both sorts of HIV seem to have originated in 2 places in Africa from 2 diverse species of primates. If it is genuine, it would have spread early on by human beings butchering monkeys contained in the jungles of Africa, and certain by sexual contact with their spouses. the in easy words reason human beings contained in the USA of a imagine that's a "gay disease" is that that's believed the virus first got here to the USA of a by Europe by a gay guy, which presented it into the gay community, and it is what made the data. Had it spread by the breeder community, i'm certain it will be stagmatized really otherwise. in spite of the indisputable fact that, contained in the USA of a, as interior something else of the international, that's now an equivalent-danger pathogen, and is not any longer restricted to, or regularly more advantageous common in any certain crew of folk.

Answer 4

The possibility of contracting HIV via oral sex is pretty low, plus, as noted by the other answers, the sample test you carried out is pretty accurate as well. What becomes dicey is when both partners either have cuts or open sores on their mouths or genitals. The transmission rate then increases quite a bit. Additionally, HSV (herpes simplex virus), syphilis and other s.t.d.s are easily spread via oral sex. The links below are not to scare you into not having oral sex, but knowing the risks involved is your duty as well.

Answer 5

If your blood works looks normal there is no cause for concern. If you're still worried though you can get the ELISA and Western Blot tests but I would say that those are not needed.

Answer 6

No you should not worry...If two doctors have told you not to worry...STOP STRESSING!!!! Did you have a HIV test done? Your red and white blood cells are to let you know how your organs are operating and to let you know if you have an infection in your system. A HIV test will let you know if you are positive or not...

Answer 7

I don't know... after all that I'm still not convinced.

I say you have super invisible HIV.

Answer 8

no, no need for concern at this point.