Will present day terrorism leads to WORLD WAR III??? What would be the impact of WORLD WAR III?

Answer 1

Unfortunately, WWIII will be global suicide, therefore in answer to your question, as long as there's rational superpowers who believe in MAD, there will be no WW3. By definition, the next world war wil be nuclear, how could it not. In a nuclear war there will be no winner. In a nuclear world, the only true enemy is war itself.

The next World War will involve a nuclear exchange, how could it not if both sides believe no price for victory will be too high. In the first 30 minutes, nearly a billion people will have been vaporised, mostly in the US, Russia, Europe, China and Japan. Another 1.5 billion will die shortly thereafter from radiation poisoning. The northern hemisphere will be plunged into prolonged agony and barbarity.

Eventually the nuclear winter will spread to the southern hemisphere and all plant life will die. You ask what country would be victorious, you are asking when will we commit global suicide. My answer is it won't happen soon because the larger superpowers are more rational than the rump states in the middle east.

While we hear talk of a nuclear-Iran or a confrontation with NorKor, little is said about the 2 bulls in the glass shop. The arsenals of Russia and the US are enough to destroy a million Hiroshimas. But there are fewer than 3000 cities on the Earth with populations of 100,000 or more. You cannot find anything like a million Hiroshimas to obliterate. Prime military and industrial targets that are far from cities are comparatively rare. Our biggest threat is from an accidental launch by the Russians.

At the point of global suicide, it doesn't matter who is on what side.... In a nuclear age like i said before, the only true enemy is war itself

Answer 2

No. Simply put most countries could not afford to go to war and there people (particularly in EU & Oceania) would not allow there governments to go to full scale world war. Most likely it would be Bush on another crusade but he will be out soon which is good for world stability I think. India & Pakistan could go at it & Iran vs Israel also. If nuclear bombs start flying and they lock wrong numbers into computers then & only then do I think WW3 is possible. Of course some terrorist group could sabotage a missile silo and blame it on that countries enemies. I still do not think we will go to full-scale war. We avoided a mass war for some 50 years after WW2 didn't we despite being in a cold war.

Answer 3

regrettably, WWIII would be worldwide suicide, for this reason in answer on your question, as long as there is rational superpowers who have self assurance in MAD, there'll be no WW3. by capability of definition, the subsequent worldwide conflict wil be nuclear, how might desire to it not. In a nuclear conflict there'll be no winner. In a nuclear worldwide, the only authentic enemy is conflict itself. the subsequent worldwide conflict will contain a nuclear replace, how might desire to it not if the two facets have self assurance no cost for victory would be too intense. interior the 1st half-hour, just about one billion human beings could have been vaporised, customarily interior the U. S., Russia, Europe, China and Japan. yet another a million.5 billion will die shortly thereafter from radiation poisoning. The northern hemisphere would be plunged into prolonged discomfort and barbarity. finally the nuclear iciness will unfold to the southern hemisphere and all flora will die. You ask what united states of america could be effective, you're asking whilst can we dedicate worldwide suicide. My answer is it won't take place quickly because of the fact the better superpowers are greater rational than the rump states interior the midsection east. whilst we hear communicate of a nuclear-Iran or a war of words with NorKor, little is declared approximately the two bulls interior the glass shop. The arsenals of Russia and the U. S. are adequate to wreck a million Hiroshimas. yet there are fewer than 3000 cities on earth with populations of one hundred,000 or greater. you are able to't discover something like a million Hiroshimas to obliterate. best armed forces and commercial objectives that are some distance from cities are relatively uncommon. Our best hazard is from an unintentional launch by capability of the Russians. on the element of world suicide, it is not significant who's on what area.... In a nuclear age like i stated until eventually now, the only authentic enemy is conflict itself.

Answer 4

Hm... If u want to ask me than I will try to answer your question

The thing that can start the WW3 is just :
1. Oil & resources crisis
2. A terrorism act that success in taking life of one of the head & prominent public figure of a famous nation
3. Territory crisis (concerned with border & resources)
4. A large international conflict that goes awfully

As long as the USA try to maintain its supremacy by weakening all their enemies & UN still had some power to negotiate, I think the WW3 is far to happened
The only WW3 that happened, only happened in FINANCIAL & global domination in economic section !

The impact of WW3 is absolutely clear, the destruction of almost human civilization & life concerned that there is so much nation in this world that own WMD or nuclear war head that can destroy everything in earth surface in just seconds easily

But can WW3 happened when there is none strongth enough to be contend with USA & UN global politics ???
Terrorist is only strong to create chaos & fear plus terror BUT absolutely not strong enough to wage a more large conflict & war that rage in many many places & territory directly

Answer 5

This is phase #1.
Kind of like sticking a toe in to test the bath water or Hitler's early moves. Will the civilized world stand up and fight back or will they try to NEGOTIATE?

So far they've lost badly on all fronts,their primary sponsor is being confronted.

If we back off ,let up the pressure,we look less committed ,less determined and they gain the advantage.
They can tell the Islamic World ,"look they have no stomach for war,their hearts are weak and we can defeat them".

Phase #2
The take over of Muslim Nations by Fundamentalist and consolidation of resourses and effort.

Phase #3
Conquer the world.
WW3

Answer 6

Who says we are not already at war? The entire globe is engaged in war right now. we are just denying the facts.

Look around the globe each and every country is at war.

People open your eyes and see the truth.

WE ARE ALREADY AT WAR.

Nuclear war is only the end means of this war.

Answer 7

I think so. If US attacks Iran, and Iran retaliates, this could be the trigger for WW3.

The impact? I think global recession. Even now, people are saying the US' economy is on a meltdown. I think during and after WW3, many countries could be bankrupt due to war, especially US. This could bring a domino effect on all economies throughtout the world.

Fear would be the dominant issue in world propaganda. One good example can be taken from the film 'V for Vendetta'. I can't imagine the developed countries adopting the type of government portrayed in the film during and after WW3.

Answer 8

unless the WWIII leads to annihilation of 80 % of the population terrorism will not end
Terrorists do not visiting cards or identfiable marks. WW can be fought with exteranl enemies and not with internal enemies.
terrorists have nothing to lose in WW it is Bush like people will stand to lose unless technological breakthrough is secured
My suggestion is US should concentrate on developing intelligence method to identfy the impending mischief rather than of full scale war

Answer 9

No, terrorism will not lead to World War 3. Like what some genius said, the next world war will be fought with stones.

In short, TERRORISM WILL NOT CAUSE WORLD WAR THREE.

Answer 10

We are already at war!!! some country wage war on its own people and some on the other country.

Look at daily news.