What do you believe is more important? Saving lives? Or not engaging in homosexual sex?
2007-10-30 17:26:56 · 23 answers · asked by Kin Korn Karn 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I thought the question spoke for itself, but apparently some of the dimmer people need an explanation.
Forget 9-11. If you could save someones life by engaging in homosexual sex, would you? People are always saying they are willing to die for what they believe in. But are you willing to do something against your beliefs to save a life?
2007-10-30 17:34:22 · update #1
I guess I am biased -- considering I am a lesbian.
2007-10-30 17:30:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 9⤊ 2⤋
Not to save your life, or the lives of the 911 victims for that matter. I dont really see engaging in a homosexual sex an option. Its just out of the question.
2007-10-30 17:36:14 · answer #2 · answered by Future 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
No, because somethings happen to wake people up! Like I mean that in the Bible some things have to come to past, before he comes back. Not engaging in homosexual sex. Sorry but we all will die, and I would not want to go to hell. in life you can not save everyone from death. In real life, your question could not even be a reality. God Bless
2007-10-30 17:36:37 · answer #3 · answered by mizzpretti 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
i am sorry, but there is absolutely no intelligent correlation here. I do understand what you are trying to ask, but frankly, i think it was a really goofy way to ask it. Do I want to save lives? Yes! Do I want to have a homosexual relationship? No. Do these two topics engage each other? No!
2007-10-30 17:47:52 · answer #4 · answered by sassy.nurse 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It would probably be a win-win situation for homosexual people, but i'll do it assuming that's the only way to save 3000 people.
P.S. I don't see any relevance between 9-11 and gay sex.
2007-10-30 17:30:48 · answer #5 · answered by 8theist 6 · 4⤊ 2⤋
I really wouldn't have to compromise anything, but okay, I would. I would've done anything I could to prevent 9-11, but there's only so much one can do...
2007-11-01 12:07:52 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Truth is, the only way to prevent the NEXT terrorist attack is for a shapely scuba babe to have sex with me in a tropical resort in at least five meters of water. Blubb, glubb 0)
2007-10-30 17:33:11 · answer #7 · answered by crypto_the_unknown 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Saving lives is more important..hopefully as long as it's not homosexual sex.
I don't give a damn about what homophobic religions think.
2007-10-30 17:29:57 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
I am straight, I am also very homely.
OK, ugly. whatever.
All the same I would not consider holding thousands or even hundreds of lives hostage just to make somebody have sex with me.
I am sure there would be much cheaper ways if getting my oil changed. Gay or straight!
2007-10-30 17:37:10 · answer #9 · answered by Y!A-FOOL 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I am not quite sure, but may be I would have agreed upon as the disaster was terrible.
It should have been avoided.
2007-10-30 17:49:51 · answer #10 · answered by Abhijit 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not everyone here is crazy and homophobic.
No one is going to burn in your fictional fires for having gay sex.
2007-10-30 17:45:31 · answer #11 · answered by Ms. Green 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋