I ask this question to see which you value more. Saving 1 person, or saving millions of persons.
2007-10-30 17:25:12 · 14 answers · asked by Kin Korn Karn 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Hate those If question. Be real dude.
Now answer your G#y question, I will put him in jail for life so he cannot harm anyone.
2007-10-30 17:28:58 · answer #1 · answered by Near of DN 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Your question is a bit out there, if you know what I mean. I would go back, if I were given the opportunity, and see that he never took control.
Would I take one life to save millions? Yes.
Do I favor abortion? No. Here's why. Look at history, not just the US. But in the US we have done many things that seemed right and/or harmless at the time. Yet as time goes by it turns into a nightmare. It may seem totally far fetched, but when we legalized abortion, it was only within the first 6 weeks. Today it is up to full term. When will it be post birth? Then we move on to 'aborting' the sick and elderly; which goes on in other countries already.
2007-10-31 00:43:28 · answer #2 · answered by howdigethere 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
You know, Yes I would
but see if things are fated to be done untill people learn
I would let some other country than Germany raise up a tyrant for the world to hate
This would have avoided some significant things in my own family tree and perhaps changed a few things
but then I wouldnt be what I am today so I might have to think more on it
Truth be told tho, I think if Hitler didnt exist, millions would have died some other way
unless the people themselves changed
I believe we are the ones that determine fate and create realities
2007-10-31 00:39:04 · answer #3 · answered by genntri 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If you had the power to go back in time, wouldn’t you have the power to get him the medical help he needed and stop him from making a lot of problems without killing him?
I speak from the standpoint of a class killed in camps, yet I still don’t hate Hitler. I feel he had medical problems and was an unfit ruler, but I wouldn’t kill him.
2007-10-31 01:22:17 · answer #4 · answered by AEH101 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
There could be another choice or two that you are omitting from the list of options.
How about taking him away from his parents and put into a more nurturing environment?
Behavior modification therapy?
Anti-psychotic drug therapy?
Institutionalize him in a mental hospital?
A lobotomy?
Any one small change COULD have had an effect, since we're talking in hypotheticals, and could have prevented the holocaust.
2007-10-31 00:38:25 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well, if the Christians are correct then g-d knew all about the massacre and wanted it to happen. Apparently all those Jews who died deserved it in accordance with the belief.
So who am I to answer this question? You know that loving
g-d who loves everyone - the one you worship night and day and pray to and ask forgivness to and it goes on and on.
This is all part of g-ds plan you know. Don't get him angry - OR- you are dead!
2007-10-31 00:34:28 · answer #6 · answered by Tricia R 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No I would not. The reason has nothing to do with the thousands who died because of him, but rather because he might not become the person we know. There are too many variables in live.
2007-10-31 00:35:21 · answer #7 · answered by John H 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
yes, kill one life to save millions is worth it.
though that would make the planet more populated today and that overpopulation would also cost lives, maybe more than hitler took.
2007-10-31 00:37:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
The end doesn't justify the means. You can't morally save a million people by committing murder.
2007-10-31 00:44:51 · answer #9 · answered by PaulCyp 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No! This question is really silly! Who determines who should be aborted?
Not Me and Not you unless one of us created the earth in six days!
Sandra P.
2007-10-31 00:30:42 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋