“I have received of the Lord that which also I delivered unto you, that the Lord Jesus the same night in which he was betrayed took bread: and when he had given thanks, he brake it, and said, Take, eat: this is my body, which is broken for you: this do in remembrance of me. After the same manner also he took the cup, when he had supped, saying, This cup is the New Testament in my blood: this do ye, as oft as ye drink it, in remembrance of me. For as often as ye eat this bread, and drink this cup, ye do shew the Lord’s death till he come. Wherefore whosoever shall eat this bread, and drink this cup of the Lord, unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord. But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of that bread, and drink of that cup” (I Cor.11:23-28).
1. Origination. From the above Scriptures little doubt is left as to who instituted the Lord’s Supper. There is no record of this ordinance being held before the Lord Jesus inaugurated it. We, as it were, take the bread and the cup from His own precious hands. The theory that Christ never lived is exploded by the Lord’s Supper. It is His, and His only.
2. Obligation. The words “this do” are a command of the Lord, and the words “all of it” (Matt. 26:27) are better translated “all of you.” This ordinance is for the entire Body of Christ.
3. Participation.
a. Who? No one but a baptized child of God should participate in the Lord’s Supper. Those who sat with Him at the last supper had been baptized. Baptism is the symbol of the commencing of the new life, and the Lord’s Supper is a symbol of the sustenance of that life.
b. How often? Some churches observe the Lord’s Supper every Sunday; some, once a month; others, four times a year; and still others, once a year; some never observe the Lord’s Supper. What is the Scriptural stipulation for this observance? “As often” (I Cor. 11:26): there is no set, rigid rule.
c. In What Manner? Some believers are very confused concerning their fitness to partake of the Lord’s Supper after reading I Corinthians 11:27-29. They notice the word “unworthily,” and immediately they review their past mistakes, ever since they became a Christian, and fear that they shall be eating and drinking damnation to themselves if they partake. Let us point out that the word “unworthily” is an adverb, and modifies the word “drink,” which means to drink in an “unworthy manner.” As far as being worthy is concerned, which one of us can call himself worthy? No one! This has reference to the act of participation. The context will give a perfect explanation. In the early church love feasts were held; the rich brought their store of food and wine, while the converted slaves brought nothing. As the feast progressed, the rich believer, keeping his food and drink to himself, soon became drunk. The poor slave, of course, had nothing, and remained sober. The Lord’s Supper was observed at the conclusion of the feast. The drunken believer could not appreciate the Lord’s Supper. In his drunkenness, the cup of the Lord’s Supper meant nothing more to him than another drink of wine. He could not discern the Lord’s body and blood; thus, he drank it “unworthily.” This fact led to many untimely deaths in the Corinthian Church: “For this cause many are weak and sickly among you, and many sleep” (I Cor. 11:30).
If the Christian feels unworthy, it is a good indication that he is worthy, and vice versa. The man who finds some personal quality in himself to make him worthy to partake of the Lord’s Supper had better stay away. The table is not spread for the righteous, but for the unrighteous, who are justified by faith.
4. Constitution. The elements of the Lord’s Supper are bread and fruit of the vine. The bread was unleavened, as it was used in the observance of the Passover, from which the Lord inaugurated the Lord’s Supper.
2007-10-30 17:04:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by Wally 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
we take communion to renew our relationship with god and it can be taken by anyone who thinks he is worthy of it. There is no rule that communion can be taken only by the elders, some even got to the extent of saying you have to be baptized.
According to me the day you accept jesus christ you are part of him and you can take communion. As for those who take once in a while maybe they don't take it seriously as the case with nearly 50%of christians. But there are some who pray and if they feel they haven't lived to the standards of god well they might skip it. I did so at times. And remember they tell you the conseqenses which will follow if you are wrong.
to wrap it up its upto the person who recives to reflect, pray and ask himself if he can really take part in it. But anyone who has accepted Jesus Christ as his saviour can take part in it.
2007-10-31 00:07:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by illuminate 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
According to the Bible that I read, anything done in faith has eternal implications. Anything done out of faith is not counted as an act of Faith, therefore is not counted as an act of righteousness. In other words, those things which are done in the flesh, die with the flesh.
Anyone can take of the wine and the bread and call it communion. But without faith it is impossible to please God. So the ceremony is nothing without faith.
Jesus said, " Do this in remembrance of me." And so communion may be taken by believer's with the eternal implication because they are doing an act of Faith in remembrance of Jesus our Lord and Savior.
2007-10-31 00:04:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by Christian Sinner 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Depends a little on which "christian" denomination you follow, but usually only those who have done the training and have received their first communion, and have since not committed a venal sin without confessing. Some argue you recently have had to been to confession, but this is cultural, it is not required (though recommended). Others can join the procession and ask the priest for a blessing.
2007-10-31 00:02:26
·
answer #4
·
answered by fakesham43 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
The Bible's teaching on Communion, or the Lord's Supper, is found in 1 Corinthians 11:17-34 and promotes "open" participation for believers. All those who are true believers in God through personal faith in Jesus Christ, His Son, are worthy to partake of the Lord's Supper by virtue of the fact they have accepted the death of Christ as payment for their sins (see also Ephesians 1:6-7).
2007-10-31 00:01:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by Freedom 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
The Eucharist
The Mass is a true Sacrifice: Christ, as the High Priest after the order of Melchizedek, offers the graces of His once and for all Sacrifice on the Cross to us sacramentally under the appearances of bread and wine through the ministry of His ordained priests
Christ's ordained priests offer Christ to the Father under the appearances of bread and wine. Christ is really and truly present, under the appearance of bread and wine, in every way: Body, Blood, Soul, and Divinity.
The Church, as the Body of Christ, offers Herself to God. Each member, as a part of the royal priesthood ("the priesthood of believers") offers his or her own sufferings and prayers, uniting them with Christ's offering of Himself. This includes the entire Church: Militant, Suffering, and Triumphant.
Christ is not recrucified; the Sacrifice of the Mass is unbloody -- after the order of Melchizedek. Christ died once at a finite point in History; but God is outside of time and His offering of Himself is eternal. The Grace Christ offers in the Divine Liturgy and what He offered on the Cross are of the same sacrifice; therefore, in no way can the liturgical Sacrifice be a "repetition" of the Crucifixion. His sacrifice is re-presented ("made present again in some way"). As the Council of Trent put it, "The fruits of that bloody sacrifice, it is well understood, are received most abundantly through this unbloody one, so far is the latter from derogating in any way from the former."
The Sacrifice of the Mass is a propitiatory sacrifice, that is, it is made for the remission of sins and for the appeasement of the Father. The Old Testament sacrifices were ineffectual, but the Sacrifice of Christ on Calvary, which the Mass re-presents, is effectual because Christ Himself is both the High Priest and the perfect Victim. Partaking of His Body (with right intention, as with all Sacraments) remits venial sin and sanctifies.
2007-10-30 23:59:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by cashelmara 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Communion is for believers only.
1 Cor 11:27Therefore, whoever eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of sinning against the body and blood of the Lord. 28A man ought to examine himself before he eats of the bread and drinks of the cup. 29For anyone who eats and drinks without recognizing the body of the Lord eats and drinks judgment on himself. 30That is why many among you are weak and sick, and a number of you have fallen asleep. 31But if we judged ourselves, we would not come under judgment. 32When we are judged by the Lord, we are being disciplined so that we will not be condemned with the world.
33So then, my brothers, when you come together to eat, wait for each other. 34If anyone is hungry, he should eat at home, so that when you meet together it may not result in judgment.
2007-10-30 23:54:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Confirmed church members usually
2007-10-30 23:55:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by Meatwad 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
In my church, anyone is welcome to take communion who wants to. The only requirement is that you be a Christian, and we'll take your word for it. I've been in other churches who want you to be a member in good standing. There are arguments both ways, but I prefer the open method.
2007-10-30 23:55:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Communion is for baptized members of God's Family. Beyond that, it is not for us to judge whom is worthy. We see only the outside. God sees the heart.
2007-10-30 23:56:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by ♫DaveC♪♫ 7
·
1⤊
1⤋