I wasn't aware that my lack of belief in god was in any way tied to evolution's credibility, but now that you mention it, and i have seen this leaked evidence, i repent.... JEBUS SAVE ME
2007-10-31 06:36:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
This is a very sorry attempt to disprove evolution. Actually, the genomic evidence is much greater than fossil evidence. How do you explain chromosome anatomical similarities between humans and chimps? Or gene order between humans and mice? What about pseudogenes found in humans, but present in chimps (and vice versa)? Fossil evidence is easier for people like you to "disprove" evolution, but the molecular biological evidence far outweighs the fossil record.
2007-10-30 13:48:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
"Moab Man" was proven to be hoax and so is this. If this was really true, then it would be all over the news. Atheism doesn't require us to believes something when there is an enormous amount of evidence against it, unlike believers in religion. Also, why would two creature both simultaneously die and fossilize in that pose. It is equivalent to saying that while I am jogging, I can die fall over and fossilize while retaining the same pose that I had at the moment of my death.
2007-10-30 13:44:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
okay??? that is fake and if not it still doesn't disprove evolution we still had to evolve.
i still think your crazy.
here are some reasons
1.Dino bones are not black and shinny like that
2archaeologist don't carry guns
3.it would have been on the news
4.your crazy
5.your ignorant
and finlay
number
6. your dumb
2007-10-30 14:04:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wow- and to think I have let my ability to think rationally mislead me all these years. My eyes have been opened (and by opened, I mean blinded).
Oh look- I also won the Nigerian lottery! The day just keeps getting better!
Edit- Dr Zapp, guns are useful on digs. You can displace a lot more earth a lot quicker with an Uzi than a shovel. ;)
2007-10-30 13:49:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by Pangloss (Ancora Imparo) AFA 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
Thanks for the laugh. The skull and teeth are anatomically incorrect, I don't have Doctor under my avatar for a chuckle. Sorry but it is a fake, nice picture of the guy with the gun, guns are really useful on archaeological digs. Oh, the fossil colour is incorrect, plus the size of the Allosaurus skull is also inproportionate for a Theropod of the late Jurassic period.
2007-10-30 13:54:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by Zappster (Deep Thunker) 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
doesn't look legit to me at all. its called photoshop. ever heard of it? im sure a lot of ppl have seen this website so y haven't i seen this in the news? so what if one of darwins theories was wrong. science is always changing. just because one of his theories was wrong doesn't mean the rest of them are. i suggest u do some research
wow i can't believe u didn't know that was a joke. thats y u do research. lol
2007-10-30 13:44:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by V 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'm not saying this isn't true and I personally believe at least some of the people prior to Noah lived amongst dinosaurs, but why would a dinosaur become fossilized while eating a human unless this occurred during the flood?
2007-10-30 13:44:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by Holy Holly 5
·
0⤊
3⤋
See I knew The Flintstones was a documentary and not a cartoon.
2007-10-30 13:59:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Hehehehe.
2007-10-30 13:47:19
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋