English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Currently I work as a Graphic Designer in Tucson, AZ. the job market here for my line of work isn't great and the pay at my current place of employment also isn't great. I'm looking to move out to the east coast in hopes of getting a job there and also being close to family. My problem is with the resumes I am sending out to companies out there I get no response, while if I send the same resume to jobs in my area I get plenty of response. Is it due to my location? should I move first then look for a job? Any advice in finding a job when out of state or even convincing someone to interview you even though you're not currently in state?

2007-10-30 08:36:48 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Business & Finance Careers & Employment Other - Careers & Employment

I do realize that finding a job first is a better option. however a lot of employers pass on resumes that are out of state. I do have savings and I can stay with my parents.

2007-10-30 08:40:52 · update #1

19 answers

of course finding a job before you move is ideal -- that way you can figure out exactly where you want to live, what you want to pay in rent, etc. however, the problem you're facing is very real. many employers don't want to hire from out of state because they want to know you're serious about relocating and that you don't expect them to help fund your move.
given that you have some savings, you're able to stay with your parents instead of leaping blindly into a lease, and you're certain about what area you want to move to, i'd say go for it. being in the area while you're job hunting will make the whole process easier for you -- you'll be able to visit companies you're interested in and be available to interview or start working on a moment's notice. because you can stay with your parents 'til you're settled, you won't be rushed into making a lease commitment that isn't right for you and be forced to take a job that might not be a good fit for you. i think you'll be fine going ahead with the move.
best of luck!

2007-10-30 08:49:56 · answer #1 · answered by G 5 · 0 1

Your problem with getting call backs could be based on a few different things.
1. The area you are in now is rapidly growing. The east coast is pretty much established and there are so many people looking for jobs in that area as well.
2. Most companies do not want to pay for a relocation. Most people applying from out of state are hoping that the company does provide some type of relocation allowance.

I still say find a job and then move. Unless you have enough money saved up to support yourself for a few months before you find something. Just remember, the job market is flooded and it could take a year to find something, so just be prepared.

2007-10-30 08:43:24 · answer #2 · answered by GMC1003 3 · 0 0

You should find a job before you move because you do not want to be jobless when you move. When you send out the resumes wait a few days and then call the employer that you sent it to, to see if they got it and had a chance to look over it. this shows the employer that you are interested in the job and they would be more likely to hire you.

2007-10-30 08:42:35 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It's easier to move there first... But finding a job first would b ideal. Do u have savings, and people u can stay with?

Edit: I have been passed over for jobs b/c of my location too. Maybe u should move first. Things r obviously not working out for u there, so u need to go where the industry is booming. I wish u luck.

2007-10-30 08:39:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Well here's a good question...
what comes first? the chicken or the egg? ;-)

If your mind is set to go to the east coast, save some money and go there and then find a job.
You see for yourself that you don't get any response, as long as they see that you live so far away.
If you don't have a family (which means moving your kids after school started, which is a bomber) - do it!
All the best!

2007-10-30 08:41:42 · answer #5 · answered by Shani 2 · 0 0

Job first—even a better one where you are. If you want to be near your family, you can continue to look for a job out East. I am surprised that you are not getting any nibbles from your inquiries out East which may tell you something about the job market. Could a head hunter help??

2007-10-30 08:44:09 · answer #6 · answered by DrB 7 · 0 0

Can you take a leave for a month or six weeks, and go stay with your parents? You could send letters to companies in that area telling them you are planning to move to the area to be near family, and will be in the area and available for an interview between xx/xx/xx and xx/xx/xx. That would probably remove their reluctance to interview someone from out of state.

Good luck.

2007-10-30 08:53:36 · answer #7 · answered by Judy 7 · 0 0

I would move first. Make sure you have the funds to live for a month if you don't get a job right away. You can always contact a head hunter for that area or a freelance agency to get some work right away. See if Aquent is in that area, they are great and I worked for them for years.

2007-10-30 08:41:11 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

If you feel this is the deterrent, add a cover letter stating that you are going to be moving to the area (even add a date that this will happen). You may also let them know that you are willing to come out for an interview.

2007-10-30 08:44:23 · answer #9 · answered by Larry S 3 · 0 0

i live in southern new england and can tell you the coast is VERY EXPENSIVE. if your going to move here make sure you have no debt, friends or relatives to stay with until you get set and at least 6 months to a year's salary saved. if your doing well where you are you might think about staying. finding work here is also rough.

2007-10-30 08:40:20 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers