He is not the so called son of God which you will shortly find out when you burn in Hell. He is The Son of God.
2007-10-30 07:29:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, supposedly, Jesus fulfilled all the paths of life - man, angel, god, etc...
He knew who he was (unlike most of us, it seems, here on earth, who do not seem to know much more about ourselves than the names and numbers we are given). He did not want to stay on earth and told the apostles what was about to happen and that he would be leaving soon. He did what he could for us while he was here, and then he ascended into heaven and sits at the right hand of God. He will come in glory to judge the living and the dead
SO GET OVER IT AND MOVE ON!!!!!!!!
He also made the Apostles fishers of men and not just fishermen, so that, while he was gone, the Apostles would be able to continue to do the things that he did.
Looks like those apostles really got busy over the last 2000 years, doesn't it, you dirty (retraction) whatever your name is, can't say what I really think here 'cuz it's kinda nasty!!!!!!!!!
2007-10-30 07:51:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by endpov 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Oy. Son of Man is an interchangeable nomenclature used by Jesus in referencing the Old Testament prophecies about the coming of the (get ready ) Son of Man (Messiah) who would liberate the Jews and restore them to greatness. When the Jews saw that this man Jesus was likely the Messiah, they rejected him in favor of the fantastical sword-wielding avenger they were looking for.
Oops.
2007-10-30 07:29:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by Goethe's Ghostwriter 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I've read the bible a number of times.
Jesus was both 100% God and 100% man. Being that, He made it possible for all humans to participate in His divinity also.
The word wasn't changed from "Son" to "Man." It was just translated differently. If you knew something about the original Koine Greek of the Gospels, you would know that the word could mean "son" or "male" or "man."
Same concept. Different translation.
2007-10-30 07:28:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by Acorn 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
The dual nature of Jesus Christ makes both claims legitimate.
Jesus is the only begotten (human birthed) Son of God,
and He is also, because of His human birth, the son of man(kind).
2007-10-30 07:31:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by Bob L 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
"Son of Man" was a euphemism that was generally understood to mean the Messiah, which drove the pharisees nuts. There are plenty of other references where he makes plain that he and God are one.
You will get a lot better responses if you aren't raving when you post your question.
2007-10-30 07:37:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Jesus was referred to as the son of man and the son of God.
2007-10-30 07:27:36
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
If you can break off from ranting for a bit, look up "son of man" in the old testament. This will shed light on the issue if you had eyes to see, but it looks like you don't.
.
2007-10-30 07:28:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by Hogie 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Before you start misquoting scripture, find a good Bible study group; so that you can at least understand what you are reading!
2007-10-30 07:33:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because he was a man, until it was later voted that he was the Son of God.
2007-10-30 07:28:13
·
answer #10
·
answered by Justsyd 7
·
0⤊
1⤋